kirkpatrick
Veteran
Kat, we did it the US way at my former airline. Believe me, the AA way is fine. You'll adjust. It just isn't that big a deal.
MK
MK
AA flight attendants
- Thread starter flybynite
- Start date
- Banned
- #122
It is a big deal to people at US who have been using it all their career, and with FCFS its a disadvantage to hub employees that has never been the case at US.
How is it fair that a in-transit passenger now takes priority over a hub employee?
How is it fair that a in-transit passenger now takes priority over a hub employee?
This was also discussed. The grievances will be tied up for a long time and when the merger is complete the grievances will be a moot point. Why do you care so much? You do not even work for USAir or AA. Let the ones that are affected by this be concerned. This is the NEW AA with your beloved DP running the show. You can see how much he cares or respects the former USAir employees. So far it has been mostly the AA way.700UW said:
- Banned
- #128
I dont owe you an explanation of anything, your are not the board owner or moderator, dont like it, dont read it and use the ignore feature.
And if US/AA violates a precedent setting grievance it goes to court where the unions will seek a TRO and/or an injunction, been there done that have you?
And funny I didnt see you tell the other posters who have posted about travel and tell them to stop.
Hypocrite much?
And if US/AA violates a precedent setting grievance it goes to court where the unions will seek a TRO and/or an injunction, been there done that have you?
And funny I didnt see you tell the other posters who have posted about travel and tell them to stop.
Hypocrite much?
Bitter I see. Never claimed to own the board and all you do is stir the pot and get people riled up over something that is their concern not yours. We will see how far the grievances will go once all is said and done. Your just looking for attention here on this board. Have a nice day if you can.700UW said:
700UW said:
You're still complaining about this? Don't forget, you wanted to march on Washington to get this deal done. Now you have it! You're not going to get everything you want...and you should be happy that US management is in control and they are actually implementing many of US's policy.
Actually, you just prove what every AA employee was thinking pre-merger...US brings nothing to the table but a bunch of whiners.
How AA processes elite upgrades too. First come first serve within tier status, and connecting passengers are given priority. Silly if you ask me since local pax offer pay more than connecting. NRSA privileges are from the company you can take what they are offering or leaving it, they will prevail. The US CBA language that you speak of won't exist much indefinitely.700UW said:
Josh
- Banned
- #134
A paying passenger has NOTHING to do with how Non-Rev travel policy.
You just have to interject your hatred for PMUS and the IAM.
Nothing changes in any PMUS CBA unless its negotiated into a new agreement or a JCBA.
Which is not taking place for the CWA who has DOH in their CBA, not the IAM FS who has DOH in their CBA.
But you just cant help yourself to interject about a subject you have no clue about once again.
The AFA both East and West, have precedent setting arbitration and third step winning awards that US just cant ignore or they will fine themselves in Federal Court.
Once again, go earn JP Morgan some more money so they can pay the $20 billion dollar fines for their fraudulent activity and help pay the $20 million increase for your CEO, if thats who you really are Mr Hidden Agenda.
You just have to interject your hatred for PMUS and the IAM.
Nothing changes in any PMUS CBA unless its negotiated into a new agreement or a JCBA.
Which is not taking place for the CWA who has DOH in their CBA, not the IAM FS who has DOH in their CBA.
But you just cant help yourself to interject about a subject you have no clue about once again.
The AFA both East and West, have precedent setting arbitration and third step winning awards that US just cant ignore or they will fine themselves in Federal Court.
Once again, go earn JP Morgan some more money so they can pay the $20 billion dollar fines for their fraudulent activity and help pay the $20 million increase for your CEO, if thats who you really are Mr Hidden Agenda.
jimntx
Veteran
Yes, but as you have said, AA and US are separate airlines owned by AAL. Therefore, your precious contractual boarding policy only applies on US side of the house. Let's not forget how the PIT f/as commuting to PHL after PIT base was closed almost caused US to lose their jumpseat agreement with Southwest because of the unseemly behavior of senior US f/as demanding that WN gate agents honor "their contract which requires boarding by seniority." (WN boards nonrevs FCFS like AA.)
