eolesen said:
I'm guessing you missed the part about JFK-BUD being there to feed oneworld partner Malev's hub, and the route being killed off after Malev ceased operations?...
Wow, so now, it's ok for AA to only start a route, because a brand new partner the alliance. And that for.... what? Wait.... "Out of pity, in order to help them out in getting traffic, and hopefully get something out of it in the process?" That makes certainly for the most LOGICAL reason to ever start a route, in the midst of the economic crisis. Great PLAN!!
That's like United Airlines deciding to start flying 777s from both IAD and ORD to LJU and PRN in order to feed traffic to ADRIA Airways.
You are being ridiculous, exactly like AA.
eolesen said:
Hey, you're the one who said:
What should a reasonable person presume after that grand statement, and then you posting a link to the cancellation of the JFK-BUD route?
Sorry if I incorrectly assumed you didn't know Malev was part of oneworld, that AA was trying to drive traffic to Eastern Europe via BUD, or that they discontinued the route after Malev went belly up.
As I said, AA wasn't one for trying to make more pretty curvy lines on a route map, which you seem to be accusing Parker of with all those aborted CLT-XXX routes you mentioned. That's not defending AA as much as it is stating a fact. AA was conservative in their planning, almost to a fault. Perhaps even the exact opposite of what was happening in Tempe or Crystal City...
Based on your comments, and over 25 years of watching and analyzing airline network changes (one of the many services we do in our consulting practice), I don't see how being more conservative was a bad thing.
If anyone was conservative, for the most part, DP was. As a matter of fact, he was ghetto conservative. The few times that he did venture into - say- launching new routes - he did it so, but boy, so conservatively, that he might as well not have, for the sake of reputation.
1)CLT-BRAZIL on a 767 new route on a subpar aircraft
2)CLT-HNL on a 767 (same thing)
3)PHX-HAWAII on a sub-par 757 with inferior First class to anyone else out there - using west aircraft. (Why? You ask, because it - (F Class on that route) does not make money, it's all upgrades. (HENCE WHAT MY ORIGINAL INTERJECTION WAS IN THIS WHOLE CONVERSATION RE: -
First CLASS and iFC, a lot of times, is just there for symbolic reasons). US Airways prides itself in giving a Muffin, sometimes even without fruit and only with Orange juice/coffee for breakfast on the LIH/KOA-PHX red-eye in FIRST.
MY SECOND STATEMENT CAME ABOUT AS AN OBSERVATION THAT ALL AIRLINES LAUNCH ROUTES FROM TIME TO TIME THAT THEY REGRET LAUNCHING. DP should take risks, but be committed at wowing and gaining customers in that process, instead of - say attempt LAX-SYD on a raggedy 763 or even worse a 762. These are the things that DP and cronies are totally capable of doing - launch something so poorly that it is just meant to fail.
AA's is no different.