Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When I get pay paycheck that particular two week period, it will basically be zero. But of course that can be the same week we get the bonus. So, bonus covers zero paycheck. On the IAM side, paycheck is normal paycheck and bonus check as well. Yes/No?
Disingenuous! Medical insurance?
And what was the cost of keeping everyone on their current insurance. We all know that it wasn't some benevolent gesture by parker/isom. That cost should be distributed EQUALLY. Hence an inequality! You can't reasonably spin it any other way with half-truths and semantics.
There you go again spin doctor. The premise of the conversation was INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS within title groups. Besides the signing bonus is crap. Everybody in every title group should have been given full retro!
When I get pay paycheck that particular two week period, it will basically be zero. But of course that can be the same week we get the bonus. So, bonus covers zero paycheck. On the IAM side, paycheck is normal paycheck and bonus check as well. Yes/No?
See that wasnt that hard coming around to the truth!To think that the airline would reward anyone for a job action by paying retro is clearly delusional.
I know. I know. What job action? The Judge was bought off? The Contempt is fake!!
Thats what your bonus is for!Not that that it makes it better but you will be able to use sick time or VC to pay this back.
Not that that it makes it better but you will be able to use sick time or VC to pay this back.
I'm gonna have to read the rules of this form to see the maximum number of people you can have on ignore status at the same time.
Well, well, well. Here's little timmy all of a sudden. Where have you been? why the long exit at such an abrupt time?? Did your leaders finally cut your puppet strings???I agree.
Thanks for posting Pat and I must say the TA seems to far surpass United. My interest in the pension is not much but it is what it is and our retirement will be better with this ta.
That said, the highlight sheet says iam pension based on total pay. That sounds better than based on a single unit at top out. However, if the pension is truly based on total pay, as opposed to top out then that would be a loss for a 3 year guy making $16.
At any rate, too many positives to vote no.
Cheers!
Everything in the individual contracts has a cost. The costs divided up by within the separate contracts by the Association have glaring inequalities.
At the top, but NOT industry leading as promised? As usual.