Kev3188 said:
This whole thing is ugly.
UA (and I think CO) had a lot of cross-utilized stations going into this merger. Instead of keeping those as is, I'm curious why they made everyone choose one side of the house or the other...
The company did this and made the split when the contract was negotiated.
They forced to make people choose in those cross utilized stations to choose ATW or BTW. When the tiered buyouts came, those people took ATW to get more money, (nearly 65K) leaving BTW not to meet the tier for the larger payout. I didn't like this "tiered buyout" scheme at all.
WeAAsles said:
It sounds like from what I've heard if the members in those cities who voted no are in the minority on their vote, they will still have the ability to bump the system if they don't want to or can't afford to stay?
There may even be a moving allowance?
Those who can leave and take the system can with no problem if a deal is accepted. And exercise their seniority and bump as well.
10,000 moving allowance for the people who will move. If people leave and there isn't a full compliment at a station, they will probably hire off the street.
WeAAsles said:
So what I see is FSC at TOS will go down from $24.60 to $22.60 if they agree to the modifications. Except SJC all the stations mentioned for changes are low COL areas where $22.60 is still a good wage.
BUT the problem I would have is the company's ability to schedule split shift work. If I need to rely on being FT or have straight hours as PT to be able to hold a second job I don't think that agreement could work for me.
Hopefully individuals in those stations who can't agree on the modifications if it passes will have the ability to leave for somewhere else in the system where they can maintain more steady FT employment if they wish?
I am wondering how split shifts will work in a place like IND? Some people can make it work if they are PT. I know people who got downgraded to PT that didn't accept the recall to FT because they had a better second job. But it is different for everybody.
IMHO, I think that people may accept this, especially those who cannot move or tired of moving. The rest will take the system (either at a newly insourced station or a hub - there will be vacancies) or buyout. The affected will find out their choices and options by the end of the month.
It's a hard choice for many, and I for one can't judge or begrudge their decision on what choice to make.
I for one don't like the precedent it sets. But my perspective is different being in a hub. We will just have to fight harder next year ('16) to save everything that is left.