s80 wrenchhead
Member
- Apr 13, 2004
- 23
- 3
Videtich and Little, need to be FIRED!! R U listening TWU?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will be interesting where we go from here and if comes to a strike I will walk the picket line, I only hope we suceed, voting no is one thing walking is going to be another one altogether
I had one excutive board member tell me the TWU doesn't have the balls to strike so I really don't know where that leaves us
Not really sure what you are talking about. Back in the spring we asked to be released pending an agreement. Its understood that when you bring back a TA that the committee feels thats the best deal they can get so unless the company comes forward with a much better offer of course we would ask to be released.The only problem I have with being released from mediation is I feel jim went behind our backs to be released.
FACT: Case in point our local prez. steve gilboy had no idea when the news came out that the TWU asked to be released and gilboy is one of the primary negotiators so what fricking page is every one on obviously not the same
maybe bob could shed some light on this FACT
so when little asked to be release are negotiating team was all in agreement?Not really sure what you are talking about. Back in the spring we asked to be released pending an agreement. Its understood that when you bring back a TA that the committee feels thats the best deal they can get so unless the company comes forward with a much better offer of course we would ask to be released.
Your President supported this crappy deal as far back as 2008, or so I'm told. After oil spiked at $150/brl they came back with something thats not quite as bad as this TA and I'm told that he led the 'exercise" that became the August 2008 proposal, then in June of 2009 he was the one leading the charge to abandon our table position and "show the 6th floor that we were serious about filling those white spaces in the dock plan". He even proposed making it a four year deal. Three months later he had an International title.
During the Road Show he told our guys that they would not bring back a concessionary deal, "restore and More" was the mantra, he did say that that if the majority of the intems were restored there that they wouldnt hold up the deal for something like a paid lunch but it was clear that they promised a lot more than what they brought back. He later denied saying that, despite many witnesses, so I really dont have much faith in what he says.
so when little asked to be release are negotiating team was all in agreement?
"...Stores 332 YES 384 NO
M&R 3371Yes 6074 NO"...
If true, we have completed one circle: one more to go.
Where did you get the numbers from?Today we witnessed the ballot count for the M&R T/A. The count is as follows, there has been unprecedented participation in this vote and it has taken all day. I appreciate your patience and solidarity.
The M&R Tentative Agreement is YES 3371 NO 6074
The Stores Tentative Agreement is YES 332 NO 384
The Tec. Spec. Tentative Agreement YES 60 NO 18
10251 total ballots cast including blanks and voids 23 that were set aside.
THE MEMBERSHIP, has SPOKEN