Will You Vte Yes Or No For Any Concessions?

[TheLarkAscending]

With all due respect, with only 110 people voting and the majority of the message board posters people with negative sentiment, I believe this poll has very little relevance from a statistical perspective.

Regards,

USA320Pilot

Then by your measurement and assessment, it should logically follow that you posting the same quotes and sentiments repetitively, would also have very little relevance from a statistical or practical perspective, also.

 

[USA320Pilot]

Lark:

Lark said: "Then by your measurement and assessment, it should logically follow that you posting the same quotes and sentiments repetitively, would also have very little relevance from a statistical or practical perspective, also."

USA320Pilot comments: No sir ye, quit the contrary because the sentiment of this board, which is now more like a cesspool, does not represent the sentiment of the rank-and-file.

Respectively,

USA320Pilot

 

[RWerksman]

Then by your measurement and assessment, it should logically follow that you posting the same quotes and sentiments repetitively, would also have very little relevance from a statistical or practical perspective, also.

lol!


He is right though. You need at around 1400 people from a randomly diverse background to have a "scientific" poll. 110 people from what could be considered one specific population segment would result in a (very) high statistical error rate.

... and if I would have paid more attention in statistics in college, I might have been able to tell you what it is.

 

[TheLarkAscending]

Lark:

Lark said: "Then by your measurement and assessment, it should logically follow that you posting the same quotes and sentiments repetitively, would also have very little relevance from a statistical or practical perspective, also."

USA320Pilot comments: No sir ye, quit the contrary because the sentiment of this board, which is now more like a cesspool, does not represent the sentiment of the rank-and-file.

Respectively,

USA320Pilot

You know, I rarely spend this much time on this board ... but lately, it does appear to be that I am posting more often. More times than not I find that it is to shoot holes through your rhetoric and gobbleygook. I find it very difficult to keep my fingers still because your posts of FUD and 'do it my way' and 'fall into formation all you unwashed, uneducated masses'; your constancy has become such a pile of crapola a great deal of the time. I'm sorry if my honesty is brutal.


I'll just cut to the chase. I believe you are wrong. The people I know believe you are wrong. I respect them. Or do I have to draw you a clearer picture?

 

[USA320Pilot]

Lark:

You are beginning to sound like a broken record. Every day I talk with people on the line, I receive many emails per day, and communicate on 6 message boards. I have the ability to talk to senior management, senior union’s officials, rank-and-file employees, station manager's airline analysts, and the news media on a daily basis.

What is happening today is no different than Restructuring I or Restructuring II -- with typical public rhetoric. In fact, just this month LOA 91 was approved by the very same margin as Restructuring I and Restructuring II.

Maybe if your husband did some more fundamental analysis he could look over your shoulder and give you better recommendations on what to write too. Or is that what is happening now?

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

 

[Cosmo]

Every day I talk with people on the line, I receive many emails per day, and communicate on 6 message boards. I have the ability to talk to senior management, senior union’s officials, rank-and-file employees, station manager's airline analysts, and the news media on a daily basis.

USA320Pilot:

I had absolutely no idea that you were the most knowledgable and most important person in the entire U.S. airline industry. Are you advising Transportation Secretary Mineta on the current U.S.-E.U. talks to liberalize the transatlantic aviation market? Do you talk to President Bush daily as well? What about God? Does Bronner have you on speed-dial? Heck, why didn't he just name YOU to be US Airways' CEO given your vast knowledge and understanding of the airline industry?

It's all about you, isn't it? Here's a news flash, Sparky -- there really are people that know much more than you do on a wide variety of subjects (and Lark's husband might just be one of them), so you ought to seriously consider showing some humility and stop throwing around insults whenever somebody disagrees with you. After all, you've been proven to be wrong on many, many occasions.

You really need to get over yourself -- the rest of us certainly have done so. And didn't your parents ever teach you that it wasn't polite to brag?

BTW, among all of your discussions with vast multitudes of VIPs regarding the current and future states of the airline industry, when do you have time to actually fly an airplane?

 

[savyinvestor]

USA320 would like to think he knows it all or pretty close to it. If you follow his posts you'll see a common thread-me, me, me,me,me! Everyone follow his lead so his status in life remains the same at the expense of others. :down: Savy

 

[pitguy]

People tell me he is just as obnoxious in real life. I think something may be wrong with him.

 

[USA320Pilot]

Cosmo:

Cosmo said: "It's all about you, isn't it? Here's a news flash, Sparky -- there really are people that know much more than you do on a wide variety of subjects (and Lark's husband might just be one of them), so you ought to seriously consider showing some humility and stop throwing around insults whenever somebody disagrees with you."

USA320Pilot comments: There are many, many people who know more than I that's why I go and ask their opinion or to find out an answer to a question. In regard to insults, I have never insulted anybody on this website and I have always shown respect.

Can you make the same claim and do you always who decorum?

Finally, at this point, I believe Lark and her so called 25-year Vet do not understand the financial markets, which is one area I have a good understanding of with more than 30 years of investing and trading experience, using multiple vehicles.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

 

[TheLarkAscending]

Please note, for the sake of accuracy and integrity this is exactly what I'd said:

Having spent more than a quarter century with someone that spends every waking moment watching/trading the market and working ON Wall Street (and quite successfully, I might add) ... he read your synopsis and laughed his a$$ off.

If one reads the quote correctly they will note that I'd stated that I've spent more than 25 years with the person. The person has MORE than 25 years of professional trading background and experience. Arbitrage, anyone?

I have absolutely no reason to lie, 'nuff said.

 

[Todd B]

This topic is drifting. Final warning before this thread is closed. Thanks.

 

[usairways_vote_NO]

With all due respect, with only 110 people voting and the majority of the message board posters people with negative sentiment, I believe this poll has very little relevance from a statistical perspective.

Regards,

USA320Pilot

USA320 did you ever stop to think that you are the one with the negative sentiment?

Also did I not point out a possible error margin rate of 100% or did you choose to ignore that fact. You seem to ignore a lot of facts

With all do regards and very respectfully

Vote NO

 

[NeedForSpeedNFS]

Cosmo:

Cosmo said: "It's all about you, isn't it? Here's a news flash, Sparky -- there really are people that know much more than you do on a wide variety of subjects (and Lark's husband might just be one of them), so you ought to seriously consider showing some humility and stop throwing around insults whenever somebody disagrees with you."

In regard to insults, I have never insulted anybody on this website and I have always shown respect.

Can you make the same claim and do you always who decorum?

Finally, at this point, I believe Lark and her so called 25-year Vet do not understand the financial markets, which is one area I have a good understanding of with more than 30 years of investing and trading experience, using multiple vehicles.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

USA320Pilot comments: There are many, many people who know more than I that's why I go and ask their opinion or to find out an answer to a question.

You must have read Henry Fords' bio

 

[usairways_vote_NO]

Lark:

You are beginning to sound like a broken record. Every day I talk with people on the line, I receive many emails per day, and communicate on 6 message boards. I have the ability to talk to senior management, senior union’s officials, rank-and-file employees, station manager's airline analysts, and the news media on a daily basis.

What is happening today is no different than Restructuring I or Restructuring II -- with typical public rhetoric. In fact, just this month LOA 91 was approved by the very same margin as Restructuring I and Restructuring II.

Maybe if your husband did some more fundamental analysis he could look over your shoulder and give you better recommendations on what to write too. Or is that what is happening now?

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

OMG the irony of ironies USA320 says someone else sounds like a broken record if that don't beat all. I cannot stop laughing and I have tears running down my face. USA320 thank you I haven't laughed so hard in I don't know how long.

Cosmo
I have to disagree, you really need something to brag about to brag so I don't think USA320 would qualify, it would be more like lieing on an application.

USA320 I would keep references about family out of discussion and I think you know why.

 

[usairways_vote_NO]

USA320 and Rwerksman this was posted in another thread is it scientific enough?
I put it in here because some of you tend to just post for your own agenda and avoid other threads

US Airways flight attendants oppose more givebacks

http://www.post-gazette.com/breaking/20040525usairp5.asp