cltrat
Veteran
- Aug 29, 2007
- 5,481
- 3,051
Who is Lehive?
Josh
he's the IAM communication guy. It;s not an elected position ,you get that job by well ,,,,, I think you know how it goes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is Lehive?
Josh
he's the IAM communication guy. It;s not an elected position ,you get that job by well ,,,,, I think you know how it goes.
In what world is the extension of specific job security provisions from only 23 percent of the IAM represented membership at UA to over 90 percent is not better?
The remainder has their property right of seniority to exercise if they are displaced, as has been the case for decades.
The fact is, the rejected TA provided more IAM represented workers specific job security provisions in than ever before. You are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts. 90+ percent is better than 23 percent, is it not?
How many stations are on the chopping block now? How many jobs are at stake now?
67 percent of United's operation is UAX flying, in which a big fat zero is protected. The rejected TA protected much of that work for the term of the TA.
You guys make it sound like there is somehow some concession of scope going on here. That's false.
15,000 at sub-CO have absolutely no job protection at all other than their property right of seniority, and about 8,000 on the sub-UA side are in the same position in all classifications. Do we forget about them? Pretend they don't exist?
Also, Veteran, the rejected TA did not have the highest medical contribution in the industry. Get you facts straight. US Airways is top at 19.4% aggregate contribution, the UA rejected TA was second at 20%. Every other airline was higher.
Also, Veteran, due to the seniority based job protections, UAL could not force all employees into the 7 hubs, not even close. Those protections, coupled with scope protections serve to protect work
Nice try guys, but your way, way off base.
I thought I was Klemm or Bartz. Maybe I am Nelson. He often has conversation with himself on forums such as this.
We understand that 96% have seniority protection. But of those 96%, they already have seniority protection in the reduction in force article where they can exercise their seniority to displace somewhere else. Do you know who really needs seniority protection? Yep, the junior agents who are not included in your seniority protection.Oh did you know that 40% of the entire Delta ramp is Ready Reserve and receives NO BENEFITS at all and accrues NO SENIORITY while Ready Reserve.
You must also realize, I hope, that Delta employees have ZERO job protection from outsourcing.
The new contract protects 96% of the entire IAM membership at United from involuntary furlough due to outsourcing. Over 26,000 out of 28,000. Thousands who don't have any security will now have it.
Get the facts Nelson.
You must also realize, I hope, that there are people working to (re)secure representation for the ramp at DL. When NC's like yours put out T/A's like this, you undercut that momentum. Your incompetence at the table combined with the outdated "we got this" mindset only serves to destroy the value proposition of being unionized.
So yeah, thanks for that.
Sure, Delta doesn't have any scope but neither does 83 of 90 stations with you pal. So what's the fuss?
Delta has 18 cargo centers and 43 ramps where they have permanent full time and permanent part time. Sure they have no work rules, but neither do you now. After a few years, the level of part time will go through the roof with this TA2. Again, no difference between delta other than you took their policy guide and stamped the IAM logo on it. Show me any union contract that only protects 7 stations?
And your wage and benefits is also myth. Sure, Delta can change theirs at any time, BUT SO CAN UNITED MANAGEMENT under section 2-2 of A2. All they have to do is scream swissport or airserve and it's done. Have you even read TA2?
And what is all this foolishness about your health care being the best in the industry? It's not. My suck contract has better health care. Your core 80% plan is $98 individual/ $293 for family. Our 80% plan is $26bucks for individual and $88 for family. Sure, part timers pay double but that will only bring them up to $176, about $120 cheaper than yours. Our 80% plan is with a $450 deductible, and the one I quoted from yours is $300 deductible but if I compare your $500 deductible, which is more than ours, we still pay about half of what you pay as a full timer. Part timers is about a wash with yours.
eonce again your lying. spin baby spin. make sure you post your video link here.
I agree with that ^^e
tell you what smart guy, if he's lying and spinning then show some balls for a change and point by point PROVE him wrong. if you can't then stfu
you show he's not Ive done my research on nelsons claims. he doesnt have to justify his spit. he just just makes claims without backing anything up.