e
tell you what smart guy, if he's lying and spinning then show some balls for a change and point by point PROVE him wrong. if you can't then stfu
stfu- nice. iwmr so it aint gonna happpen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
e
tell you what smart guy, if he's lying and spinning then show some balls for a change and point by point PROVE him wrong. if you can't then stfu
you show he's not Ive done my research on nelsons claims. he doesnt have to justify his spit. he just just makes claims without backing anything up.
Okay thank you, I'll just go with you can't then.
In what world is the extension of specific job security provisions from only 23 percent of the IAM represented membership at UA to over 90 percent is not better?
The remainder has their property right of seniority to exercise if they are displaced, as has been the case for decades.
The fact is, the rejected TA provided more IAM represented workers specific job security provisions in than ever before. You are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts. 90+ percent is better than 23 percent, is it not?
How many stations are on the chopping block now? How many jobs are at stake now?
67 percent of United's operation is UAX flying, in which a big fat zero is protected. The rejected TA protected much of that work for the term of the TA.
You guys make it sound like there is somehow some concession of scope going on here. That's false.
15,000 at sub-CO have absolutely no job protection at all other than their property right of seniority, and about 8,000 on the sub-UA side are in the same position in all classifications. Do we forget about them? Pretend they don't exist?
Also, Veteran, the rejected TA did not have the highest medical contribution in the industry. Get you facts straight. US Airways is top at 19.4% aggregate contribution, the UA rejected TA was second at 20%. Every other airline was higher.
Also, Veteran, due to the seniority based job protections, UAL could not force all employees into the 7 hubs, not even close. Those protections, coupled with scope protections serve to protect work
Nice try guys, but your way, way off base.
bullsh!! that says nothing just one jackasses sermon ,let's see in the contractpage 1
so you call me an idiot? ok call me anything you want go back to the sideline with your nelson pom poms. I wont rest until I get my retro. Not you or nelson or any other person is going to spread lies and misrepresent the TA and get away with it.
an idiot is a compliment to what you really are.
Clearly you can't prove him wrong by quoting sectons and paragraphs of the contract.
stfu- nice. iwmr so it aint gonna happpen
it has been done but you chose to ignore it or perhaps your his alter ego?
so you call me an idiot? ok call me anything you want go back to the sideline with your nelson pom poms. I wont rest until I get my retro. Not you or nelson or any other person is going to spread lies and misrepresent the TA and get away with it.
nelson tell ya what why don't we do a paragraph by paragraph debate just me and you.
the cheerleaders can watch on the sidelines. I let you start if off. watdousay.
IWMR?
I'm not exactly sure what the qualifications for "communications coordinator" are, but I have to think that being able to clearly convey thoughts and ideas is right up there.
Based on your actions here, it's clear you're punching above your weight...
Hey hey ho ho you will never know because your pal Nelson is a liar and self promoting fake. Checking into his record he has never won anything on his own merit. It looks like his political party is going to dump him because he is riding on their shirttail s and he has become a liability for them
Check Eulo's posts