FA Mikey said:
Yea I was removed, no biggie. I have gotten Emails from a few others, who said the same thing. Seems that anyone who actively supported removing jw was removed.
[post="173985"][/post]
Did they remove the unanimous Board of Directors as well? I swear, this is more drama than a Mexican telenovela.
It would be so ironic if we had to get the 4m forwarded to us by TWA! That would crack me up to no end...I don't think that they realize TW sees EVERYTHING on the 4m.
If they removed Frank E. that is just ridiculous. I looked forward to Frank's posts because I learned something (not to mention where to find it).
I watched him get bashed for being a "know-it-all" (and he was usually right!) THB supporter.
Just because I supported THB does not mean I do not hold her to the same standard I held JW.
I really was on "the fence" during the runoff and watched the debate twice before making my final vote.
IMO, JW was very defensive during the debate and either deflected what came his way or flat-out avoided the issue.
I just can't vote for that. I was more worried about THB's possible concessionary positions more than anything else.
I can tell you from flying out of BOS that the 30-40 year F/As are QUITE formidable. I've never seen as many nearly-ruptured forehead veins in my life.
My fav quote from JW was from an NYC rag. He couldn't accept that the DOL did not call for a new election "with the vote so close". He did not seem to have a problem with this when he "won" by 5 votes.
What a crock of "crap" (a nice term, BTW)
My second favorite quote has been that "the majority of AA F/As prefer Ward, they just did not vote" (well, I guess good-luck next time around, I voted and I am allowed to b**ch, ad nauseum.) They did not vote? What was their excuse?
How in the H*ll can you fault TWA for being focused and block-voters? It's been pointed out repeatedly that they actually bothered to vote, unlike over half of our membership.
Coop
SLT