WingNaPrayer said:
Coldplay, who pissed in YOUR Cheerios?? Good gawd you're starting to sound like . . . well . . . ME!
Nobody has any pull around here so don't worry about it. Offensive posts and those that can be construed as a personal attack are always deleted no matter who writes them. Believe me I know, I've had more than a few posts deleted from this board.
[post="172836"][/post]
well Wing, doesn't it make you wonder why your posts were deleted even if you thought that they were not personal attacks or offensive? if my posts were "offensive and constructed as personal attacks" and should be deleted by moderators, how do you explain all the "personal attacks" done by these Regulars which were left by the moderator, like:
"(deleted by moderator)"
"(Deleted by moderator) "
"Too funny Mike...That Jay...that (deleted by moderator) a real piece of...ahum..."work." "
"I honestly believe he is on permanent trip removal as jw's press secretary."
"Also when I can stand on the otherside of the cart and hand John a styrofoam cup and say "I need tea!" Then watch his a$$ run back and forth from the cart to the galley all day long! "
"If everyone chips in we can send WAArd a going away present from here: A BIG PILE"
"Department of Labor: The TRUE Compound W! (Wart remover) "
"LOl. this one may require surgery and a biopsy"
and countless others. Now tell me, are those remarks not personal attacks on someone, or should we just turn a blind eye and say "well, he does deserve it". Is it fair to call someone a "(deleted by moderator)", find it funny too, and when YOU use it back on them, it's a big No-No? Or is it perfectly legal if you only IMPLY things?
Look I'm not trying to defend ward's actions and protecting the guy . It's just a matter of what these "regulars" assume is humorous to them and worthy of their time in this whole debacle. It's really nice to know that there are "mature' individuals like them working alongside us, people who'd actually say to you "I know you are but what am I?" or resort to namecalling and wishing the worst for another person, all because they feel they've been treated unjustly by John Ward, and they actually find it FUNNY. Turn the tables on them and all of a sudden "oh my gawd, you're homophobic, you're ignorant, you're a racist, you have no justifiable argument, you must be john ward, etc."
for once I'd like to read something worthwhile without having some bitter bitty making some wisecrack about what they'd do or wish on another person (whether it be JW or a Ward supporter or anyone else for that matter), but I guess it's all wishful thinking.
TWAnr says to me "You must not have any viable positions to articulate if you feel it necessary to resort to homophobic derogatory name calling in order to make your point."...uh, yeah, right...and YOU had nothing to say when one of your buddies here called someone else a ( deleted by moderator) so i guess it alright then because according to your rules, THAT is funny! Or by Mikey calling someone's daughter a whore by "mistake" because he thought they were talking aboput Paris Hilton. Now that might get a chuckle out of you guys in here (again, your rules) but I'm Sorry, That will only get you gonged by Chuck Barris in the REAL World.
Like I said, give it a few years, you'll hear the same ole gang harping about the APFA with their tired old remarks, only difference are the initials they'll be using to place the blame on. 2000 it was "DH", 2004 it was "JW", stay tuned folks for "THB" to be gangebanged by these airline "experts" when national elections come along in 2008.
