First off Observer, I have never stated anything about DOH. If you can find it anywhere please notify me. Second, the promises made by AA to the TWA people are a legal binding contract just as the contract between a union and a company. So, if the contract between AA and the TWAers is broken, there must be a remedy. It is irrelevant what APFA says. This is not under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). APFA was not even a player when these promises were made. It is sort of irrelevant who you elect.
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
Billy...L1011Ret said:
Then, they should solely be suing American Airlines, not the union. There was no binding contract between the union and the TWA union. And nothing that I can see compelled the AA union to acknowledge any of these alleged promises.
Their beef should be with the company which made the promises.
kirkpatrick
Veteran
We are.IntelligentObserver said:
MK
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
But according to Billy, the union is being held responsible for this alleged breach of promise, as well.kirkpatrick said:
Which is it?
kirkpatrick
Veteran
Both are involved. We'll let the courts decide.IntelligentObserver said:
MK
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
Medr...you have proven my point.medr said:
A quick perusal of this board, and all threads related to the seniority issue, prove that the TWA people only know how to react with sarcasm and nastiness. Even when asked a simple question, the TWA people immediately resort to name-calling and condescension.
As a bystander, I am hardly inclined to believe anything your group says on here, simply due to your arrogance and rudeness.
How do you expect to win support, or at least agreement with your cause, among the readers on this board, when you are so nasty?
I think all of you, Billy included, do need to get a life.
IO - I am reposting your first posting to let you read it. Are you suprised that people respond in a negative way to you - when you post something like this?IntelligentObserver said:
Then you twist it and say others are nasty to you.
First of all - L1011 has always been kind to you and you come back each time and tell him to get a life. He has asked for you to respond what he posted that was misleading - however, you don't want to respond with an intelligent reply - but would rather keep telling everyone to get a life.
Yes, I did call you belligerant observer because that is how your posting came across.
twasilverbullet
Advanced
- Jan 25, 2004
- 206
- 0
observer, from your tone it sounds as if you have more "vested interest" than what you claim. Are you sure your not j.w. or j.n.? You sure sound like 'em!!!
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
I assume that by "JW" you mean John Ward who is the President of the union which you are suing. I get that you don't like him.twasilverbullet said:
Who is JN?
You are so paranoid. You post, for all the world to see, your assertions, and then when somebody questions you, you either attack or accuse them of being somebody who is involved. Too funny.
twasilverbullet
Advanced
- Jan 25, 2004
- 206
- 0
Boy, this idiot (observer) needs help soon.
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
Again, more name-calling. You prove my point well.twasilverbullet said:
OI - you came on this board to fight and be belligerant.IntelligentObserver said:
I find it interesting that you complained about the people posting and stated that they needed to get a life. When you monitor this post All day long.
L1011 kindly ask you to show where he stated something that was not correct - and you ignored to respond to that (because you could not). And still L1011 responds kindly to you. You WANT to respond to things where you can be belligerant.
On Feb 15th - on this post there were 6 different posters and you felt the need to monitor the board ALL day long to respond to 5 DIFFERENT posters.
GET A LIFE!
posting made from 6 different people and your responds:
2:40 you responded at 3:02
3:30 you responded at 4:47
7:37 you responded at 9:47
10:22
10:41 you responded at 11:07
12:02 you responded at 12:02
You spent 9 hours monitoring this one particular post.
I say - GET A LIFE
IntelligentObserver
Member
- Jan 23, 2004
- 42
- 0
Dude...you are so tightly wound.jsn25911 said:
Guess your response is proof that you, seriously, need to get a life, as well. You might also note that I do not only post on the AA board, because, despite what you AA/TWA people might think, the world does not revolve around you.
Sounds like you're getting ready to have a stroke. I love it.
