Is Jim Little's secratary a union member? Or is the TWU paying her so much so she doesn't unionize? I hope she is not just an expensive prostitute (no offense intended just a question)
AMP drive is "dead stick" huh? I guess maybe to the cuttin' oil and the bass fishin' TWu crowd, but not over yonder in them thar other parts.Well if you must know what is going in T-Town I will try to explain. The members of TWU Local 514 are anticipating the upcoming round of contract negotiations and the buzz is what are they going after but to date no information has been released.
Oh, and if your interest for the T-Town question is about the AMP drive, well its a dead stick, even my welder friend who encouraged me to read the AMP Constitution and offer my opinion has quit coming around too. I guess he too seen the light....
AMP drive is "dead stick" huh? I guess maybe to the cuttin' oil and the bass fishin' TWu crowd, but not over yonder in them thar other parts.
Is that bright light from the train coming in TWu negotiations?
Wrong again...............High SpeedThe only light I've noticed around here lately is coming from the dark corner of AMFA's failed past here at AA.
Oh, false alarm. Its only Uncle Fester standing with a 40watt light bulb in his mouth supporting a new casualty, AMP......LOL
That's great Speedy, you remember our short-lived contract that AMFA negotiated for the TWu in 2001. Too bad the TWu can only follow instead of lead, but you got another chance to show us that TWu Power again on the 14th....LOLThe only light I've noticed around here lately is coming from the dark corner of AMFA's failed past here at AA.
Oh, false alarm. Its only Uncle Fester standing with a 40watt light bulb in his mouth supporting a new casualty, AMP......LOL
That's great Speedy, you remember our short-lived contract that AMFA negotiated for the TWu in 2001. Too bad the TWu can only follow instead of lead, but you got another chance to show us that TWu Power again on the 14th....LOL
That Uncle Fester dude, was that "TWu light bulb" Kirk Wells that the TWu 514 sent to seek and destroy back in the day??? Those were the days....funny stuff.
"To the doors and stop!!!" To the doors and stop!!!" hahahahaha......
I expected nothing less from you, a true TWu wanna believer. Do like your master tells you, YES man. It's also no surprise your beloved TWu failed again to bring back an acceptable contract.Hey Hackman, You and your pal Odie opted to set up these arrangements. Remember, I voted YES......LOL
Is Jim Little's secratary a union member? Or is the TWU paying her so much so she doesn't unionize? I hope she is not just an expensive prostitute (no offense intended just a question)
Marlene,I am Marlene Borisuck, Executive Secretary to TWU International President James C. Little, and the subject of deeply offensive and hurtful remarks by “Duke 787” (posted at 11:12 am on December 6 under the “American Airlines” topic “What’s the Attitude in Tulsa”). I will not comment on whether Duke’s remarks are legally defamatory as that may be raised by me in the future.
“Duke 787” obviously considers himself something of a humorist; one may be forgiven for not cracking a smile, though, at his notion that TWU’s salary structure for its administrative employees is determined by the need to keep us from belonging to a union (I, along with fellow staff members, happen to be a dues paying member of TWU). However, Duke’s so-called humor alone would not even have elicited from me a comment, let alone the demand which I make below.
What is hurtful and offensive in Duke’s flip remarks is his expressed—and alleged—“hope” that I am “not just an expensive prostitute.” Duke may think that he has managed to avoid accusing me of being a prostitute by raising it as a purported “question”; but in fact, his comment was obviously engineered to make precisely that accusation. His expressed “hope” that I am not the sort of degraded creature that he accuses me of being is no more believable than his silly claim that he intended no offense by his remark. Is there a woman around who would not be deeply offended by his words? In my particular case, I note that I was notified of his offensive comment by a 1 AM call from my husband; hearing about it from him only multiplied the pain of seeing Duke 787’s words in print, spread all over the cyberworld
I ask, and demand that AviationForums immediately remove Duke 787’s offensive and hurtful remarks from the website, as your website rules provide (a copy of this was sent to “contacts” at AviationForum).
I also ask that Duke 787 identify himself and apologize in this Forum. An apology is obviously necessary and justified. And an anonymous apology, equally obviously, has no meaning. Is Duke a real man? His willingness to take responsibility for his deeply offensive statement, and to himself stand up and apologize for it, will provide the answer to this question.
The Internet can be a wonderful place, as well as a terribly cruel one. As I join the ranks of those who have been injured by its cruel side, I ask AviationForums and all its readers—including Duke 787—to join with me in rejecting the kind of cheap opportunities that the Internet offers to make anonymous and hurtful remarks.
I am Marlene Borisuck, Executive Secretary to TWU International President James C. Little, and the subject of deeply offensive and hurtful remarks by “Duke 787” (posted at 11:12 am on December 6 under the “American Airlines” topic “What’s the Attitude in Tulsa”). I will not comment on whether Duke’s remarks are legally defamatory as that may be raised by me in the future.
“Duke 787” obviously considers himself something of a humorist; one may be forgiven for not cracking a smile, though, at his notion that TWU’s salary structure for its administrative employees is determined by the need to keep us from belonging to a union (I, along with fellow staff members, happen to be a dues paying member of TWU). However, Duke’s so-called humor alone would not even have elicited from me a comment, let alone the demand which I make below.
What is hurtful and offensive in Duke’s flip remarks is his expressed—and alleged—“hope” that I am “not just an expensive prostitute.” Duke may think that he has managed to avoid accusing me of being a prostitute by raising it as a purported “question”; but in fact, his comment was obviously engineered to make precisely that accusation. His expressed “hope” that I am not the sort of degraded creature that he accuses me of being is no more believable than his silly claim that he intended no offense by his remark. Is there a woman around who would not be deeply offended by his words? In my particular case, I note that I was notified of his offensive comment by a 1 AM call from my husband; hearing about it from him only multiplied the pain of seeing Duke 787’s words in print, spread all over the cyberworld
I ask, and demand that AviationForums immediately remove Duke 787’s offensive and hurtful remarks from the website, as your website rules provide (a copy of this was sent to “contacts” at AviationForum).
I also ask that Duke 787 identify himself and apologize in this Forum. An apology is obviously necessary and justified. And an anonymous apology, equally obviously, has no meaning. Is Duke a real man? His willingness to take responsibility for his deeply offensive statement, and to himself stand up and apologize for it, will provide the answer to this question.
The Internet can be a wonderful place, as well as a terribly cruel one. As I join the ranks of those who have been injured by its cruel side, I ask AviationForums and all its readers—including Duke 787—to join with me in rejecting the kind of cheap opportunities that the Internet offers to make anonymous and hurtful remarks.
I will not comment on whether Duke’s remarks are legally defamatory as that may be raised by me in the future.
[snip]
I also ask that Duke 787 identify himself and apologize in this Forum. An apology is obviously necessary and justified. And an anonymous apology, equally obviously, has no meaning.