Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did you know?Ah, I see my fans are still begging for attention.
At least you dropped your red herring about the mechanics from your previous post, but this isn't much better. The tax ID issue is relevant because it is part of a pattern of subterfuge by the company in presenting MDA as a separate entity. Your straw man argument falsely links the IRS to the seniority issue, when the real IRS related question is this. How can two separate companies share the same ID number ? Don't worry, the counsel for the MDA pilots we already knows the answer.I am not aware of any such authority (and as far as I know, the IRS does not particularly care how an employer structures its labor relations), but perhaps you can enlighten me.
You must be unaware that the issue of intent was addressed directly by none other than Jerry Glass while in deposition. Jerry stated under oath that MDA was mainline. Got that? Jerry Glass stated under oath that MDA was mainline.Again, you would have to go first to the language of the agreements in place, and then to the intent of the parties.
This poster demonstrates the piloting profession has been reduced to the lowest common denominator if this is representative of anything. This has to be some kind of circus act that is for entertainment only- no other logical explanation for the repeated Kaczynski-style incoherent manifestos about nothing from this guy.
So since I am supposedly biased against the East MEC, explain why I am not posting that the MDA pilots have an air-tight case and will get whatver they want from the East MEC.
No offense, but if you didn't see that before now........
The fun will really start once the company submits the list (or lists depending on status of SBU). With the NMB having to make some determinations on validity of cards and eligibility to vote, the list(s) will undoubtedly get close scrutiny by both sides.
Jim
Those on the list but furloughed or on leave of absence are excluded. Perry Mason you are not.
Because you're biased against all things involving the east. Always have been. Why is that?
ALPA started the whole Mid Atlantic thing they allow furlough mainline pilots to fly the E170/175 seat capacity of 70-86 at express rates. Then it roll down hill for the rest of the employee groupsA complete black-eye on the industry as a whole. Pathetic.
Bear is objective in his posts and many readers can easily pick up on that. When you are blinded by so much emotion it may be a little more difficult to see this, however.
Question for you (again). Was Mid Atlantic Airways staffed by furloughed mainline pilots? Yes or no answer. Although, I did gain quite a bit of insight in your shell-game, where-is-the-ball-now response as well as your tremendous effort of history convolution. Needless to say I am stunned at how your pilot group completely sold out the junior guys in that MAA deal. What a complete abortion of pilot unity and it should freighten all of us on the west to be even associated with you morons now. And I use the word moron after careful consideration but I cannot think of a better demonstration of self-serving, anti-union behavior in the piloting profession as what you guys are responsible for with the MAA deal. A complete black-eye on the industry as a whole. Pathetic.
Before you claim it was the injustice brought about by your MEC leaders at ALPA (some of which are still in office today), I don't remember any of you or your ilk demonstrating in front of ALPA headquarters in protest of the MDA operation. You and many of your USAPA kind espousing unionism and "fairness for all" are nothing but a collection of hypocrites.
Did/who ALPA know? Remember they hide behind confidentiality agreementThe pilots going to MDA were not informed by ALPA of this change and now ALPA faces a lawsuit of 175 million. The fact that the CBA was not followed does not
If you are furlough are you active?Mid Atlantic was staffed by active pilots.
Implicit in your argument is the assumption that it is somehow legally impermissible for one company cannot have two separate seniority lists for the same craft, even if the company and a union agree to such an arrangement. Still waiting for something to back up that proposition.The tax ID issue is relevant because it is part of a pattern of subterfuge by the company in presenting MDA as a separate entity. Your straw man argument falsely links the IRS to the seniority issue, when the real IRS related question is this. How can two separate companies share the same ID number ?
The company was smart enough and so soncerned about maintaining this supposed smokescreen to do all that, yet was silly enough to have only one taxpayer ID #?One thing I am sure you did not know is that the company laundered the paychecks for MDA through a different payroll company, actually increasing the cost per employee, in order to maintain a false appearance.
Ah, I see. So my postings on this MDA v. East dispute, where I am saying it appears to me the East side has a stronger legal footing than the MDA side, shows I am biased against the East. Got it.Because you're biased against all things involving the east. Always have been. Why is that?
That is all I was trying to find out as well. I am not a former Trump Shuttle Pilot and I understand that everyone of the Shuttle pilots had to quit Eastern in order to get hired at Trump Shuttle. So maybe the question is, What is their true DOH? Ironically, each Trump Shuttle pilot has their original Eastern DOH listed on the USAirways master seniority list.
If, however, you are a DOH advocate, why not adjust the list. Sure...I would lose some seniority, but my principle overrides my desire to be senior.