des nudo
Advanced
- Oct 28, 2008
- 161
- 9
Stating facts is hardly 'threatening' someone. Bottom Line. If you guys are so totally convinced that you've (usapa) has done absolutely nothing illegal, from day one with regards to the West, why delay? Why the "deeper pockets to wait it out" strategy? Lee Seham has convinced you guys that you're 100% in the right and you voted 90% in favor. I'd say that's displaying a confidence that you have nothing to fear.
We say you're wrong. We say that all your arguments are completely irrelevant to the real issue...the Judge was stated that as well but we each choose to believe what we want. The Trial will move forward. It will be concluded one way or another.
Also, you and USAPAs negotiating committee wouldn't know what "leverage" was if it punched them in the face. They have less than zero leverage at the table and they'll never gain any as long as an entire section of the contract is tied up in Fed. court. That game can go on for years and years if either side wants it to. So, as you phl reps say, you are being held hostage by litigation. They forgot to mention they were the reason for it.
Are you betting your life on this cowboy?
We say....I say...you say....
It's hammer-time, kiddo. This has been fun, but the time has come for us to part in the most un-flattering way possible.
This may leave a mark on you...I suspect it will....