US Pilots Labor Discussion 7/13- STAY ON TOPIC AND OBSERVE THE RULES

[nic4us]

Quick question for you! Do you guys do a job action when the court tells you the Nic is not the list they have to use????

Did the West have a meltdown over the 9ths opinion? No.

As I predicted 2 months ago when the 9ths ruled, other than operational issues regarding lack of staffing mostly by the F/As, and the continued need for recall of pilots, there has been no decline in the West operational performance.

The better question would be, does the east have yet another meltdown, when told for the umteenth time, that you are not going to get DOH.

 

[LSS]

The better question would be, does the east have yet another meltdown, when told for the umteenth time, that you are not going to get DOH.

NOT GOING TO HAPPEN... SHALL I REMIND YOU YET AGAIN... YOU ARE NEITHER THE JUDGE NOR IMPANELED AS A MEMBER OF THE JURY!

This is the company merely covering their a@@...

 

[Phoenix]

Integrity Matters!

I wouldn't be so quick to accuse the 9th of denying that.

 

[cleardirect]

I find it fascinating the legal repeaters on this board. Seham has somehow sold a theory to the east that you all completely believe.

You disparage Nicolau as being senile.

You call a district judge biased,

You call the Leonidas lawyer uninformed.

Now you are saying the very expensive and very experienced company lawyer don’t know how to read the ninth circuit ruling.

Could it be that if everyone in the world is wrong and you think you are right? That just maybe the only one with a differing opinion is wrong? Some one said that this case would get tossed right away. Why would the company waste time and spend money if they thought it would get tossed?

It is entirely possible that Seham is either misreading the ruling or you guys are misunderstanding what is going on here.

 

[Phoenix]

No, that's not what I'm talking about. Perhaps you should talk to your neighbor and ask about this. (copied post from another webboard from someone much smarter than you)

"In fact, under the "related case" rule, there is a strong argument that it WILL go to Wake:

F.R.Civ.P. 42. Consolidation; Separate Trials
LRCiv 42.1
RELATED CASES; CONSOLIDATION; SERVICE; ASSIGNMENT

(a) Related Cases.

(1) Whenever two or more cases are pending before
different Judges and any party believes that such cases (A)
arise from substantially the same transaction or event; (b.)
involve substantially the same parties or property; (C)
involve the same patent, trademark, or copyright; (D) calls
for determination of substantially the same questions of law;
or (E) for any other reason would entail substantial
duplication of labor if heard by different Judges, any party
may file a motion to transfer the case or cases involved to a
single Judge. The motion shall be filed in the case with the
lowest case number and shall be heard by the Judge assigned to
that case. The caption of the motion to transfer shall list
the case number of that case, followed by a complete listing
of the case numbers of all the cases to be considered for
reassignment. In addition, a notice of filing motion to
transfer, with a copy of the motion attached, shall be filed
in each case to be considered for reassignment."

To assert two cases are related, generally speaking, it would be beneficial to demonstrate that there are in fact at least two cases to compare.

 

[luvthe9]

It is entirely possible that Seham is either misreading the ruling or you guys are misunderstanding what is going on here.

How bout Noooooooo!!!!!!!!

 

[cleardirect]

To assert two cases are related, generally speaking, it would be beneficial to demonstrate that there are in fact at least two cases to compare.

Case 2:10-cv-01570-ROS
Case 2:08-cv-01633-NVW

Might want to look at the parties and the facts of these two cases. You will be surprised how much they compare to each other.

The Addington case did not just disappear like it never happened. The facts and evidence are still valid. Judge Wake did not just take two weeks off in the summer of 2009.

 

[prechilill]

To assert two cases are related, generally speaking, it would be beneficial to demonstrate that there are in fact at least two cases to compare.

1 + 1 = 2. I know this is new to you, but numbers don't lie. (unlike Bradford and Seaham!)

 

[nic4us]

It is entirely possible that Seham is either misreading the ruling or you guys are misunderstanding what is going on here.

Um,,,Actually Clear,,,it is both,,,not an either/or.

 

[ROACLT]

1 + 1 = 2. I know this is new to you, but numbers don't lie. (unlike Bradford and Seaham!)

If you read the federal rule, this is FRIVILOUS at best. The federal rule REQUIRES both actions to be pending. The Addington case is NOT pending before the original judge. Only the US Airways case is now pending before one judge. To say that both of these actions are pending before different judges is quite a stretch, which should be no surprise based on some of the other requests made by the Addington attorneys.

 

[Phoenix]

If you read the federal rule, this is FRIVILOUS at best. The federal rule REQUIRES both actions to be pending. The Addington case is NOT pending before the original judge. Only the US Airways case is now pending before one judge. To say that both of these actions are pending before different judges is quite a stretch, which should be no surprise based on some of the other requests made by the Addington attorneys.

Actually the reason this should be denied is because the West lawyers have made a terrible error in an extremely important statement of fact.

The West lawyers said, "US Airways and America West merged in 2005." How dare they abandon the righteous position?!!

 

[cleardirect]

If you read the federal rule, this is FRIVILOUS at best. The federal rule REQUIRES both actions to be pending. The Addington case is NOT pending before the original judge. Only the US Airways case is now pending before one judge. To say that both of these actions are pending before different judges is quite a stretch, which should be no surprise based on some of the other requests made by the Addington attorneys.

Has the ninth issued a mandate yet? Has the ninth decided on the stay of the mandate yet? Has Judge Wake dismissed the case from his court room yet? Is the injunction still in place baring usapa from using anything other than the Nicolau?

I would say that the Addington case is still pending.

 

[Phoenix]

Has the ninth issued a mandate yet? Has the ninth decided on the stay of the mandate yet? Has Judge Wake dismissed the case from his court room yet? Is the injunction still in place baring usapa from using anything other than the Nicolau?

I would say that the Addington case is still pending.

Sure... the passengers on the Titanic were not wet yet either, so there was plenty of time to have more folks board it.

 

[Ames]

Sure... the passengers on the Titanic were not wet yet either, so there was plenty of time to have more folks board it.

That must mean that until the Titanic was fully under water that the sinking wasn't yet "ripe". You guys are so FOS!

 

[Phoenix]

That must mean that until the Titanic was fully under water that the sinking wasn't yet "ripe". You guys are so FOS!

Actually Mr. Ripe is attempting to manifest while there is still time to purchase a last minute ticket to join the party on deck. To each his own.