Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep you're right. It is downright unfair to David Koresh.Wow , that's pretty harsh of you to compare someone to David Koresh. To CM defense , the UAL deal was very close to a done deal. I see no problem with him posting the articles that he does. Why don't you guys just Fn chill with the insults to this man. He doesn't co e on here and insult anyone . But yet most of you seem it's ok to insult a guy who is just posting info for oters to read . If you don't like what he post then press ignore .
To all,Yep you're right. It is downright unfair to David Koresh.
I have no doubt Doug Parker will come out swinging. He has to. His legacy is at stake.
I wish US would just switch to oneworld.
I am happy that US is a member of Star Alliance. From my perspective as a passenger, I like my choices of flying primarily on US, but having the option of choosing UA for some of my flights. I don't see what benefit US passengers in the Seattle area would gain by having US in Oneworld.
I think DP is an advocate of the Star Alliance..... He has said that many, many times.The benefit is that if US wants to tie up with AA, then switching to oneworld allows them to do so without merging. If they also cooperate with AS, as AA does, then you could fly US,AA, or AS and earn miles. That offers many more options in SEA than does UA. Obviously any change is going to effect certain pax, but I'm sorry to tell you-US is going to do what's best for the company to compete and grow, regardless of what a passenger living in SEA (or DTW or OKC or XXX) wants.
I think DP is an advocate of the Star Alliance..... He has said that many, many times.
The company lost a lot of money running the airline you want to bring back and they have made a lot of money running the type of airline you see today.I remember flying USAir in the early 90's and they had great service, including meals on many short flights. I think trying to be lowcost and full service is too hard. They should go back to being full service and dominate the East the way they once did. Corporate contracts could bring in a lot of money. If they focused on the East and partnered with AA out west, they would be in great shape. I think there is enough business to go around and all could be successful (AA/US, UA/CO, DL/NW). I'd like to see everybody "win", not just the people on the top. But, what do I know...
The company lost a lot of money running the airline you want to bring back and they have made a lot of money running the type of airline you see today.
Sorry I was thinking specifically about a couple years ago when the profit was a record (IIRC) for the company.Well, truth be told US still hasn't made "a lot of money running the airline you see today." In fact, on average US has lost over $200 million/year since the merger through the last complete year available - 2010. The analyst's are predicting a small profit this year, but not nearly enough to reverse the average.
Jim