Kind of what I figured. Lucy will get what she makes now nothing more, while the rest of the wedding party gets delta +3%. And just to be clear in this, East and West are Lucy in this scenario.
Ummmmm, no.
Ummmmm, no.
We'll be APA members and under a new contract before the end of the year.
But if you personally want to stay on LOA93, be our guest.
Ummmmm, no.
We'll be APA members and under a new contract before the end of the year.
But if you personally want to stay on LOA93, be our guest.
Ummmmm, no.
We'll be APA members and under a new contract before the end of the year.
But if you personally want to stay on LOA93, be our guest.
Absolutely, and vice versa. Every player better be playing their heart out. In the end everyone will take the best deal that shakes out.
Wow, I want to meet the person who edited this APA report!
On the part of the AA unions? Certainly - they may just be playing along to gain some leverage in their bargaining with AA management. But if you're saying that Parker is just playing along with the AA unions so those unions will have some leverage I would seriously doubt that. No management hires advisors and puts so much effort into making a potential merger sound so advantageous just to help another company's unions. Parker desperately wants this merger no matter how many times he says that US is in a position to prosper on it's own. Whether he succeeds or not remains to be seen, but I think Parker has his game plan all laid out and so far it doesn't seem that the US employee's role is that of a bench warmer. No star QB job for USAPA...
Would that fence prevent Parker from expanding the USAirways side of the operation (with its much lower wages) at the expense of the AA side (with its much higher wages)? Reason I ask is that APA has a track record of not tolerating lower-paid divisions at the same company: the APA sickout over the Reno Air acquistion was the response.
