The information in my earlier post was a fact. When union demagogues cannot discuss the facts they try to discredit the sender. The issue is simple: Many of US Airways' unions have and continue to hurt US Airways' employees. These unions are led by demagogues who have political leaders who appeal to the emotions and negotiating/TA ignorance of the less-informed members in order to gain power. Meanwhile, the rank-and-file continue to get hurt. So far US Airways' F/A's have an estimate of a $40 million economic loss, which is growing with the time value loss of money, the NMB warned the union if the TA was not ratified future negotiations would be "parked", and the AFA would maintain their current contracts for the indefinite future.
My problem is not with the rank-and-file. My problem is with the demagogue union leaders who did not inform the F/A's of this important development. Where is the transparency whether it's USAPA, the AFA, the IAM or other unions? In this case should the two MECs have let the F/A's know that if the TA was not ratified, that the NMB told the parties negotiations would be parked, and that there would be no new contract for a long period of time? And, should the MECs have told its members that a TA rejection could affect the F/A's seniority with a merger with AA similar in scope to the pilot's problem? Me thinks so...
At least people in this forum cannot say they were not warned of the problem because they were told of these developments before the AFA's vote...by me.
USA320Pilot
P.S. Losing a union election by two votes is not an issue. But, some people try to misrepresent information because they as demagogues cannot dispute the facts.
[background=rgb(255, 255, 255)] [/background]