i take it you infer that U has changed the bankruptcy laws by circumventing DIP??i don't think ATSB has authority either concerning BK law.Separately, the New York Times recently reported the company is in discussion with the ATSB and one topic is a pre-packaged bankruptcy filing, with lease holders and labor squarely in the "cross-hairs". As I understand it, the filing could preserve the loan guarantee, not require DIP financing, and preserve the security.
********************************************************************
Companies that request abrogation of the labor agreement but it must meet the following nine (9) distinct requirements:
1. The debtor in possession must have made a proposal to the union.
2. The proposal must be based upon the most complete and reliable information available at the time of the proposal.
3. The modification must be necessary to permit reorganization.
4. The modification must provide that all affected parties be treated fairly and equitably.
5. The debtor must provide the union with such relevant information as is necessary to evaluate the proposal.
6. The debtor must have met with the collective bargaining representative at the reasonable times subsequent to making the proposal.
7. The debtor must have negotiated with the union concerning the proposal in good faith.
8. The union must have refused to accept the proposal with good cause.
9. The balance of the equities must clearly favor rejection of the agreement.
you make a speculative argument that is open ended. both parties may negotiate but please do not accept the fact that they will both have a successful ratification of any negotiations.(ie:don't count your chickens before they hatch)The AFA and CWA seem to understand this since they have elected to begin formal negotiations with the company, especially with the news the company could default on AFA and IAM pension payments in September.
i'm going into real estate and see a huge market of houses in the cranberry area going up soon.Employees in Pittsburgh and Charlotte will have thousands of workers competing for a few jobs in the area and it will be a very difficult situation.
judges do not set wages..they abrogate or enforce the existing contract .it’s doubtful the judge would pay above market pay and benefits for a failed company.