I find your behavior disturbing knowing who your audience on these boards is.USA320Pilot said:I find it interesting that the CWA and the company are going back to the bargaining table this week.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
I find your behavior disturbing knowing who your audience on these boards is.USA320Pilot said:I find it interesting that the CWA and the company are going back to the bargaining table this week.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
Why would you find that interesting? The CWA has ALWAYS said they were willing to sit down with management and talk. Nothing new or exciting or sinister here, no matter how much spin you want to put on it.USA320Pilot said:WestCoastGuy:
You could be right in that for your work group the cuts could be deeper than $13.10 in bankruptcy court.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
P.S. By the way -- I believe the $13.10 per hour wage rate was an "opener". Nonetheless, I find it interesting that the CWA and the company are going back to the bargaining table this week.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
-----------------------------------------------------------------------How about doing us in this airline industry a favor and stop taking paycuts you are leading this industry to welfare wages. Everytime you give them more of your paycheck the rest of the airlines follow with this race to the bottom. If you are going to loose your medical, dental and only make 10 bucks per hour its time to shut them down nobody could live off that. And I dont want to hear that IAM slogan at least we have a job. And they mention america west for your wages. Well I have seen their planes and they are falling apart literally. Thats what low wages Produce JUNK.E-TRONS said:I too hold firm that we should NOT open our contract for a number of reasons:
1) Blatant violation of our contract which is a testament to the "good faith" the company exhibits to its maintenance employees. Why should we talk to these LIARS????
2) Failure of the company to reduce the non-labor costs (besides fuel). BTW, What exactly are the non-labor costs comprised of?????
3) Failure of management to disclose what exactly will be their portion of sharing the pain?????
4) Continued threats from CCY.....if we don't make a deal then...blah, blah, blah. I say let the judge decide and govern our management. Then there will be no more monkey business......just business.
-
Excuse me the IAM is the only union not discussing concessions.PRATT4056 said:And I dont want to hear that IAM slogan at least we have a job. And they mention america west for your wages. Well I have seen their planes and they are falling apart literally. Thats what low wages Produce JUNK.
I DO agree with your assesment about the pay cuts. I doubt very seriously if the company is interested in "Mutually Agreed Upon". Obviously the work groups will not agree to their demands to "Sign the Paper." That leaves the other two alternatives....as one American Hero said...."Lets Roll". And we'll see who blinks first.USA320Pilot said:Either they will be with mutually agreed upon contracts, court ordered agreements, or through liquidation.
Once again you post something on which you have no idea, about, I informed you on a previous post and you still post false information verbatim once again.USA320Pilot said:Tadjr:
What’s interesting is watching the restructuring play out. For example, if the IAM “concession stand is truly closed†than why is there a need for the IAM general VP to meet with the AGC’s? What is there to talk about? According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette the IAM “intends to discuss the US Airways situation†the Board of Arbitration Opinion & Award on the outsourcing of A320 maintenance work “could bring the IAM to the bargaining table depending on the outcome.â€
These are the type of developments that are interesting watch after you witness the rhetoric by a few people on this forum, especially with AMFA watching over the IAM’s shoulder.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
Once again your lack of how the IAM operates shines like the sun.
GVP Robert Roach and the five US Airways General Chairmen meet regularly about once a month or via conference call.
So don't try to imply or take anything out of it. It is a normal course of duties and they are meeting prior to a whole District 142 Staff and Executive Board meeting that will take place this upcoming week.
And the Aribtor Bloch is not expected to render his decision no earlier then end of August as the post-hearing brief's rebuttals were not due till yesterday. So it is not immediatley before any decision is issued.
So keep trying.
I thought I was looking at an eye chart there, Pitbull! Freaked me out!PITbull said:BIG
NOT as Big
littler
small
I agree its interesting alright.USA320Pilot said:Tadjr:
What’s interesting is watching the restructuring play out.