Ah, but you go to such lengths to support her. According to you, the FAA note supports her, the lack of cross/rebuttal supports her. Amazing that you make one post "chastising" easties for jumping to conclusions (which still hasn't stopped the claims of poop through the mail, "stolen" info, etc) yet look at the number of posts you've made pointing out the things that support Wells (to your way of thinking).
Yep, hypocrisy. One post directed at easties (that had no effect) vs what...40-50 or more telling the westies that they're wrong because this or that supports Wells according to you. How could anyone NOT see the equivalence there...
Jim
Jim,
Let's do a little review, shall we? My first post on this thread was 4 pages into it! Here it is:
“Where are the facts Clear? I've seen only very vague statements from the company about the whole issue and NO comment from them about why they had the crew removed by security. Do you have them? Even the opening letter of this thread has no indication of who the author was. Lay it out for us.
The west contends that everything action by USAPA and east pilots is about DOH. Why would Captain Wells do this for DOH when she is in the top 517 that already have their DOH intact?”
I just asked questions, didn't I? Seven posts later, on the same page, you declare this:
“ I know nothing other than what I've read, the same as you. Unlike you, however, I haven't chosen sides.
Jim”
There you have it, already accusing me of choosing sides, after two posts, one of which was all questions and the other was this:
“There is a big difference between making a proclamation of support for a union and the concept of DOH vs. intentionally making false claims about the suitability of an aircraft and downing it, as some on here claim. Seems a stretch for me that a person who has not had their seniority order alter would do that. Would you do it for relative position?
Join us with the facts oh wise one. Tell us what you KNOW about the incident.
BTW, you seemed to be in a hurry to get my replies to your questions last night, but I don't see any from you today.”
What a stretch!!!!!!!!!!
I went to great lengths to show that the stories didn't add up. Mr. Eagles claims were different than what was in the FAA letter, the same letter that the westies had used as “evidence”! For the hundredth time, IT WAS NOT TO PROVE HER INNOCENT, IT WAS TO PROVE THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE THE INFORMATION TO PROVE HER GUILTY. You came to the conclusion that I was trying to prove her innocent, and the facts and logic do not back you up.
I've had many posts taking on my own guys over the C18 and SSgate. How many posts have you taken on westies about. What did you say on this thread? Two? Two posts vs. all the ones after me?
The emperor no clothes. We know what you are Jim, it's time for you to accept it.