This thread has generated some interesting conversation. Thats good.
First off, I want to that Bob Owens for visiting the afternoon shift at JFK last week. Your points were well taken. I wish I had more time to ask questions.
I read your membership update (dated 9/21) and thought it was very positive. Its about time that we worked together as part of a process instead of blaming others for our problems. Please see
http://twu562.org/ to read the full text.
To be honest, I nearly fell off my chair when you wrote "many of Jim Little's stated goals I agree with". This is not a bad thing. It is a sign that we can overcome our differing viewpoints and possibly achieve something for the membership you represent.
Too many times, people would attack each other, rather than debate the issue.
Although many of Local 562's convention resolutions were not passed, I am happy to see that Owens explained the process in his last post.
Frankly I am amazed that Little didnt put a plexiglass cage around the Local 562 delegates. Many of those who are now in elected Office spent the better part of a decade calling him every name in the book. Now they have to work with him.
Ken MacTiernan - Sarcasticly putting my name on your posts detracts from the points that are being debated. I know what you have done for AMT's. Dont put a blemish on it. Bob and Chuck post on this site of their own volition. I have known both for a long time. Just for the record they are not bad guys. BUT I have disagreed with some of their strategies and positions, and I will debate (and post) those points as I they arise, as I did here.
If anyone needs to know who I am, please send me a personal message.