Chuck Schalk
Veteran
- Nov 17, 2006
- 1,042
- 1,149
For the record, Jim Little and his team ran unopposed and no votes were required.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the record, Jim Little and his team ran unopposed and no votes were required.
The fix here would for the DOL to interject and force a legitimate voting system on the convention. Kind of like “Who wants to be a millionaire?â€, audience vote. Not sure that's ever going to happen.
Also, was there some choice? Did some one run against Little?
The best thing that could happen here is for each local to put out a report as to what occurred day by day, vote by vote, i.e., some transparency? At least this will give you an idea of how your money was spent.
M-theory
why don't you go ask Harry,angel, and Angelo (alternates) their opinion on them attending the convention and report back what they say. Or is this just about Bob and myself?
This is about the entire board. While the Pres. and Treas. are primarily responsible for the finances of the Local, the Board can motion and direct the Pres. I dont know if anyone objected to this outrageous expense, but if they did, they were outvoted. You and Owens are the leaders of the Local, and thus held to a higher standard and must accept resposibility for the leadership of the board.
I am sure all involved had a WONDERFULL trip.
PS - I hear there are some nice shots of some ladies of the evening? Any truth to that?
This is about the entire board. While the Pres. and Treas. are primarily responsible for the finances of the Local, the Board can motion and direct the Pres. I dont know if anyone objected to this outrageous expense, but if they did, they were outvoted. You and Owens are the leaders of the Local, and thus held to a higher standard and must accept resposibility for the leadership of the board.
I am sure all involved had a WONDERFULL trip.
PS - I hear there are some nice shots of some ladies of the evening? Any truth to that?
This is about the entire board. While the Pres. and Treas. are primarily responsible for the finances of the Local, the Board can motion and direct the Pres. I dont know if anyone objected to this outrageous expense, but if they did, they were outvoted. You and Owens are the leaders of the Local, and thus held to a higher standard and must accept resposibility for the leadership of the board.
No one was outvoted, no one on the board objected to going to convention and everyone on this board has one vote to run the local. We all have our duties and responsibilities but everyone on the board is equal when it comes to decisions of the Executive Board.
Pete,
You are very angry. You seem to WANT to blame Bob and Chuck for anything? Why? Is it because of your short comings? I am sure that if the membership is as angry as you are then Bob and Chuck will not get re-elected. Accountability? Bob and Chuck have more integrity and accountability than you could ever wish to have. That's my theory.
This is about the entire board. While the Pres. and Treas. are primarily responsible for the finances of the Local, the Board can motion and direct the Pres. I dont know if anyone objected to this outrageous expense, but if they did, they were outvoted. You and Owens are the leaders of the Local, and thus held to a higher standard and must accept resposibility for the leadership of the board.
I am sure all involved had a WONDERFULL trip.
PS - I hear there are some nice shots of some ladies of the evening? Any truth to that?
Well everyone went so figure it out, it was unanimous. I didnt vote because I didnt have to, I would have voted to allow the whole or any board member who desired to go because I felt its a good learning experience and between the seven of us odds are that a few of us would be around for the next one.
Outrageous expense? Well if you and enough feel that way start a recall drive, its your right, a right that the previous administration denied the members.
I feel it was a worthy expense, we were able to spread out and network. Those who had never been, and thats everyone except me , and its been eight year for me, learned a few things. By establishing connections it increases our odds of getting something done in the future. I knew people who the others didnt know and they knew people I didnt know. The opportunity only comes around once every four years, we have the money, it doesnt do the members any good sitting in a savings account.
Ladies of the evening? Please dont be that desperate for dirt.
Although I'm dissapointed we didnt get our resolutions passed I'm still glad we went. Admittedly it wasnt a terrible experience. If you like Vegas I'd suggest that you volunteer to atend the skills conference, then you could go on AAs dime.
Thank You;
I disagree that sending 7 officers was a worthy expense, I do not think that you should be recalled. but used poor judgment on this decision.
Sorry about the "ladies of the evening comment". It was in poor taste.
Thank You;
I disagree that sending 7 officers was a worthy expense, I do not think that you should be recalled. but used poor judgment on this decision.
Sorry about the "ladies of the evening comment". It was in poor taste.
SHAMELESS......I dont know who you are trying to "OUT", but I really dont care. Bob and Chuck can speak for themselves. I have only pointed out some truths. Any anger here is yours.
Do you support Zimmerman in his new International position? I hope it works out for you and your Local.