ThirdSeatHero
Veteran
usairways_vote_NO said:You win man. Just like AMFA did
When you back track like that I can't lose - you posted my quote after there genius.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
usairways_vote_NO said:You win man. Just like AMFA did
usairways_vote_NO said:Maybe this is where I got it. Sorry didn't read that you switched your stance. My bad
I share the sentiment
I suspect that with everything that has already happened in the legal arena between AA Locals & ATD that someone if not many someones are already prepared to make a challenge should the NMB try to certify the Alliance without a vote. Add to the mix, you have a congress that would just love to stick it to a pair of unions, even more so armed with would what would be a clear deviation from the NMBs published rules concerning mergers.
We'll have to wait and see
It is all semantics. Spin as you will we know how you stand and you are dead wrong.ThirdSeatHero said:
Oh and perhaps you should brush up on your reading, as your comprehensions clearly lacking ....
My position hasn't changed - You'll notice I used the word "stated" as in a previous post, if you bothered to find and read that previous post you would've found this ....
Nice try
Guess you didn't catch the AMFA thing there. Talk about reading comprehension problems LOLThirdSeatHero said:
When you back track like that I can't lose - you posted my quote after there genius.
usairways_vote_NO said:BTW - since some are to lazy to look it up here are two quick links to the NMB using Single Carrier and Single Transportation interchangeably.
https://storage.googleapis.com/dakota-dev-content/41-NMB-No.-23-Findings-Upon-Investigation-AA-US-Airways-CWA-IBT-Association-ACSEA-IBT-CWA.pdf
https://storage.googleapis.com/dakota-dev-content/CORRECTED-VERSION-41-NMB-No.-38-NMB-Case-No.-R-7401-CR-7126-Findings-Upon-Investigation-AA-US-Airways-APFA-AFA-CWA.pdf
...Jones states that the two airlines had also negotiated a process for Flight Attendants and several groups
41 NMB No. 23
- 98 -
of ground employees to arrive at common terms and conditions of employment on a relatively expedited basis following a single-carrier determination and certification of a representative by the NMB....
...According to Paul Jones, on or about December 19, 2013, APFA and the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), the representative of US Airways’ flight attendants, reached an agreement for bargaining and representation that would require both unions to jointly file a single-carrier petition within six months of...
usairways_vote_NO said:It is all semantics. Spin as you will we know how you stand and you are dead wrong.
And I was wrong it was VortBoy playing the keyboard commando thing to me
usairways_vote_NO said:Guess you didn't catch the AMFA thing there. Talk about reading comprehension problems LOL
Hint I was being sarcastic you did lose.
Bogey said:Talking to 542 leaders, they would have run a card drive, if that's aloowed, to get the show of interest above 50 percent. International did nothing.
No, NAAP was created and a card drive started when the TWU cancelled negotiations with the company. That was in early May. It was a couple months later that the TWU suspended the board, it was then that they resigned and got behind NAAP. The former board didn't create it, the TWU was the catalyst for it when they broke the camels back and the members had enough.NYer said:Didn't they eventually create the National Association of Airline Professionals (NAAP)?
IAm tool boy, why don't you stop with the accusations and sniveling to others about name calling and telling lies. You name call as much as anyone on this board and your IAm lies are as prevalent as your Delta buddy and Josh you love to hate. Your so fanatically petty, and a real blow hard in posts of nonsensical fecal matter, in an industrial union flavor of course.700UW said:Glad to see you are name calling.
I am not getting paid by the IAM, is that too hard for you to understand?
My post was 100% the truth.
Think what you want, says it all about you, attack the posted when you cant refute the facts.
usairways_vote_NO said:It is all semantics. Spin as you will we know how you stand and you are dead wrong.
And I was wrong it was VortBoy playing the keyboard commando thing to me
your the twu cheerleader,answer the questions!NYer said:What was the outcome of those negotiations surveys sent out by some of the TWU Locals?
...when are the joint TWU/IAM negotiations prep going to take place?
...when are are going to find out who will be on the TWU Negotiation Committee? Has that been decided?
Is there anything going on?