What's new

TWU and IAM representation alliance vote

Will you vote in a TWU and IAM representation alliance? (A/C maint. only)


  • Total voters
    66
Status
Not open for further replies.
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
700UW what has the IAM done for you to garner such loyalty?
 
 
The IAM gave him a position as a work at home Mom and his commission is rewarded by the number of posts, lies and how many times he can post the following quotes.
"Don't let the facts get in the way" and "Are you that stupid".
 
1AA said:
The IAM gave him a position as a work at home Mom and his commission is rewarded by the number of posts, lies and how many times he can post the following quotes.
"Don't let the facts get in the way" and "Are you that stupid".
Care to prove your accusations?
 
Let me give you a hint, you cant, as you are lying.
 
700UW said:
Care to prove your accusations?
 
Let me give you a hint, you cant, as you are lying.
Lighten up Francis. Geez your wound tighter than a Koo Koo clock.
 
WeAAsles said:
But give me a break on this stuff. You ain't going to say ANYTHING that either union does or has done TWU or IAM is any good because you got an agenda to sell.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/07/us-unitedairlines-employment-idUSKBN0FC2GG20140707

United Airlines would shift these jobs from its payroll and hire other companies to provide the employees, under the outsourcing plan.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/united-airlines-outsourci_b_5609016.html
Union employees who have been with the company for years -- many making a respectable $50,000-per-year salaries -- will be replaced by non-union employees who will be paid less than half -- between $9.50 and $12 per hour.
 
john john said:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/07/us-unitedairlines-employment-idUSKBN0FC2GG20140707United Airlines would shift these jobs from its payroll and hire other companies to provide the employees, under the outsourcing plan.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/united-airlines-outsourci_b_5609016.htmlUnion employees who have been with the company for years -- many making a respectable $50,000-per-year salaries -- will be replaced by non-union employees who will be paid less than half -- between $9.50 and $12 per hour.
It's a horrible situation that you can thank the IBT for when they didn't understand Scope when they represented Cal employees before the IAM took over. They inherited the contract from the IBT that gave UAL the ability to close those stations.
 
WeAAsles said:
It's a horrible situation that you can thank the IBT for when they didn't understand Scope when they represented Cal employees before the IAM took over. They inherited the contract from the IBT that gave UAL the ability to close those stations.
I hope the CWA doesn’t inherit/adopt the SCOPE of the TWU and IAM
 
700UW said:
Its not a normal representational election, try again.  And a GLR for the IAM wrote it for the IAM part.
Still avoiding to give the names I see, speaks volumes.  The membership wants the names so they can inquire for themselves, your word does not count for anything and hasn't for some time now.  Just shows how scared YOU and the 2 unions really are when the membership has options, pathetic...
 
Guess you havent read the new scope for the IAM at US.
 
Best in the industry, as is Mechanic and Related at US.
 
No one has more scope in their CBAs.
 
swamt said:
Still avoiding to give the names I see, speaks volumes.  The membership wants the names so they can inquire for themselves, your word does not count for anything and hasn't for some time now.  Just shows how scared YOU and the 2 unions really are when the membership has options, pathetic...
Oh I know the name, very well, he is a friend of mine and anyone at US is free to contact him, they know who he is.
 
I'm scared of nothing, but it seems you are, I woner why a SWA employee is so concerned what happens with US and AA.
 
Yep you have the best pay, but you dont have the best scope at WN.
 
And you will see that the NMB will be holding the vote or recognizing the Alliance, I hope you are ready to eat your words.

Just as TSH has explained to you many times.
 
700UW said:
Oh I know the name, very well, he is a friend of mine and anyone at US is free to contact him, they know who he is.
 
I'm scared of nothing, but it seems you are, I woner why a SWA employee is so concerned what happens with US and AA.
 
Yep you have the best pay, but you dont have the best scope at WN.
 
And you will see that the NMB will be holding the vote or recognizing the Alliance, I hope you are ready to eat your words.
Just as TSH has explained to you many times.
We all now see how hard you are working to hide the authors name.  They also see how hard you are working to keep them confused until it is too late.  Provide the name WT.  It is obvious you are hidding something about this alliance vote coming up, very obvious...
 
Not hiding anything, its not hard to figure out who is the GLR assigned to the US property.
 
I'm not hiding anything, I dont have a dog in the fight.
 
Keep making up accusations, I find it quite amusing, so I see you are avoiding answering the questions I poised to you.
 
If any US Mechanic and Related has a question about the Alliance they know who to contact to get clarification.
 
I cant speak for the PMAA TWU represented employees on who they need to touch base with.
 
john john said:
I hope the CWA doesn’t inherit/adopt the SCOPE of the TWU and IAM
Remember that the TWU is the companies best friend. So a few whispers coming from the TWU to the companies ear might prove to be a challenge for you guys in negotiations. Good Luck.
 
john john said:
I hope the CWA doesn’t inherit/adopt the SCOPE of the TWU and IAM
You dont seem very smart.
 
Since the TWU and neither the IAM dont represent the Agents at AA, who have no scope, how would that happen?
 
And the IAM at US has the best scope for fleet and mechanic and related in the whole industry.
 
700UW said:
Snip"
 
And you will see that the NMB will be holding the vote or recognizing the Alliance, I hope you are ready to eat your words.
Just as TSH has explained to you many times.
Unless the current NMB rules change the choices will be more than two.
 
14.201
Official NMB Mail Ballots
 
It is NMB practice to list the incumbent, the applicant, the intervenor, the “write-in” option, and the “no representative” option in descending order on the ballot. If there is no incumbent and more than one applicant, the Investigator will determine the placement of the names on the ballot.
 
14.305-2
Valid Ballots
 
Voters will have the opportunity to vote for representation
by an organization or individual or for “no representative.” Where the voter’s intent to vote for representation is clear, the ballot is valid and will be counted as a vote for representation. If an organization or individual receives a majority of votes cast, it will be certified as the representative. If the majority of votes cast are for “no representative,” there will be no representative certified. In the event of a tie vote between votes for representation and votes for no representation, no representative will be certified.
Valid ballots cast for representation include “write-in” ballots which clearly indicate the voter’s desire for representation. Voters must “write-in” the name of a specific organization or individual to cast a valid vote.

 
 
16.0 RUN-OFF ELECTIONS
When an election results in no option receiving a majority of the valid ballots, or in the event of a tie, the Board shall hold a run-off election between the two options receiving the largest number of votes. The procedures for run-off elections are set forth in the NMB Rules § 1206.1 (29 CFR § 1206.1).
In a run-off election, the ballot will not include a space for “write-in” votes. The option receiving the highest number of votes in the run-off is declared the winner. (See 29 C.F.R. § 1206.1).

 
§ 1206.1
      Run-off elections.


      (a) If in an election among any craft or class no organization or individual receives a majority of the legal votes cast, or in the event of a tie vote, a second or run-off election shall be held forthwith: Provided, That a written request by an individual or organization entitled to appear on the run-off ballot is submitted to the Board within ten (10) days after the date of the report of results of the first election.
      In the event a run-off election is authorized by the Board, the names of the two individuals or organizations which received the highest number of votes cast in the first election shall be placed on the run-off ballot, and no blank line on which votes may write in the name of any organization or individual will be provided on the run-off ballot.
      (c) Employees who were eligible to vote at the conclusion of the first election shall be eligible to vote in the run-off election except (1) those employees whose employment relationship has terminated, and (2) those employees who are no longer employed in the craft or class.

 
 
References:
NMB representational Manual
 
http://www.nmb.gov/documents/representation/representation-manual.pdf
 
 
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29-Labor, referencing Part 1206
HANDLING REPRESENTATION DISPUTES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT
 
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2009-title29-vol4/xml/CFR-2009-title29-vol4-part1206.xml
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top