Tulsa

Our dues money at work.....
"Union making effort to keep American Airlines jobs in Tulsa"

http://www.krmg.com/news/news/local/union-making-effort-keep-american-airlines-jobs-tu/nJcx5/

But they don't use our dues for political purposes, right?
 
Our dues money at work.....
"Union making effort to keep American Airlines jobs in Tulsa"

http://www.krmg.com/news/news/local/union-making-effort-keep-american-airlines-jobs-tu/nJcx5/

But they don't use our dues for political purposes, right?
I guess the union has given up on AFW, eh??????

I guess they don't care about keeping jobs in North Texas?????
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #108
You're question is more geared towards the AMFA and AMP organizers to show what percentage of Line and OH voted in favor of seperation. Where's AA Pitbull?? I think AMP came up 1000 short and AMFA was real close until the TWU and AA started adding dead people to the list, right?

Look, you're finally seeing the ramifications of listening to the TWU. Right now, it's too late in the ball game to re-organize with AMP or AMFA because our contract will be destroyed either voluntarily or by the judge. When Tulsa had the chance to seperate, you chose the TWU....good for you!

Line maintenance can only do so much within the law.....WE are not the majority, yet. And, when WE are the majority....I guarantee the TWU will be GONE!! That's if I stick around.

You know Buck, why is it that 2K to 3K line amt's can see right thru the TWU and 5K to 6K can't?? We get the same threats, but WE ignore those threats and move forward by signing those cards anyway. I mean, how bad can change be compared to what WE are about to experience, right?
No my question is to you and the Line Mechanics. I am not sure what actually accured with the AMFA vote. I do not know how long you have been "working for the TWU". I believe that you and the Line Mechanics are rather naive if you think all mechanics at OH are satisfied with the TWU. You tell me why you believe that the line will ever become the majority? Explain to me how the TWU will be gone, over a vote of an assumed majority? It is going to take the elimination of fear for that change to occur. The TWU is a business and I do not see that business filing for bankruptcy any time soon.

I am of the opinion that those on the aircraft docks and possibly the engine shops are really seeking change with little or no fear, as that has been wiped from our existance due to the filing. Those in the support shops hold the majority. The TWU supporters control the local because the real majority has grown tired of no leadership. Literally if the whole membership attended you might see some change. If their is anyone who disagrees with my position, please say so. I know of only one person who works in a support shop who has been attempting change for years and he has been telling you and the line that for maybe longer than you have been at AA.
 
You left out somethings. The old contract under the iam allowed 100% outsourcing as long as there were no layoffs. Which was stupid do to attrition eventually doing away with everybody. The AMFA put a 40% cap on that. The twu had a 20 or 22% if I remember correctly. I bet that % is going to grow well above 40% in the near future. As far as pay goes the twu allowed our negotiations to slow to a crawl to allow
the AMFA to raise the bar because they new that if they did not get a better contract they would be gone from the property at aa. The former president at afw (Joe Hasen) had informed many of the members that we would be lucky if we achieved $29 Hr at the end of the contract. The funny thing
is he said this before the AMFA achieved there contract and then all of a sudden we topped out at $35.89 an hour (base pay and license prem) at the end of the contract. We also recieved 12 sick days,up from the previouse 10,but the AMFA had already gotten that also. The bottom line is the twu rode another unions coat tails again

Truth here....
Between the TWU "contract" following AMFAs ind leading deal at NWA, and the AMFA rep card drive debacle at AA;
What more proof does one need to see utter collusion between AA and TWU? Pathetic and frankly, disgusting!
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #111
Rumor: TWU Local 514 and International having Backdoor meetings Cirri, Hewitt, Viditche and Gless. $10.00 pay cut for jobs..
 
The TWU would not want to lower wages; that would lessen the dues money they get from the members.

Doing away with all the benefits?

Now that I could believe! :lol:




Rumor: TWU Local 514 and International having Backdoor meetings Cirri, Hewitt, Viditche and Gless. $10.00 pay cut for jobs..
 
This is why it should just go to the judge. Any contract drawn up by the TWU will include screwing any members still on payroll in exchange for temporarily delaying the inevitable layoff. 2003 was not that long ago. The TWU is not in business for the best interests on the membership.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #115
There is certain people (TWU Leadership) in Tulsa going to special meetings regarding saving Tulsa jobs
 
There is certain people (TWU Leadership) in Tulsa going to special meetings regarding saving Tulsa jobs
<_<------- To be fair, that's as it should be! But----- saying that, how they go about doing that is another matter! Now, in the present environment, I wouldn't expect too much! Little may be a lot of things, but I don't think he's that dumb!
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #118
<_<------- To be fair, that's as it should be! But----- saying that, how they go about doing that is another matter! Now, in the present environment, I wouldn't expect too much!
The TWA employees went through their ordeal, now it is fair to wack the industry by lowering the compensation for those that will not be laid off. I understand your form of AFL-CIO Unionism, however I am no longer willing to pay the cost. I have given my career to this type of unionism and if the TWU is successful with this maneuver they will not be saving jobs as myself and a few thousand others will no longer play this game. I may not get to retire for ten more years, but I will continue to punish the TWU for more than their political position. If the TWA people want to lose their seniority and now wages, they can volunteer for those reductions. MCI you portray yourself as a union man, why should I pay you part of my wages to keep you employed? I believe you said you were retired? I hope you got yours brother.
 
Let it go Buck, the TWA purchase was eleven years ago. Plus there's only a few hundred original TWA people left.
 
The TWA employees went through their ordeal, now it is fair to wack the industry by lowering the compensation for those that will not be laid off. I understand your form of AFL-CIO Unionism, however I am no longer willing to pay the cost. I have given my career to this type of unionism and if the TWU is successful with this maneuver they will not be saving jobs as myself and a few thousand others will no longer play this game. I may not get to retire for ten more years, but I will continue to punish the TWU for more than their political position. If the TWA people want to lose their seniority and now wages, they can volunteer for those reductions. MCI you portray yourself as a union man, why should I pay you part of my wages to keep you employed? I believe you said you were retired? I hope you got yours brother.
<_<------ Buck, you got my meaning totally wrong! I believe it's the responsibility of whatever Union represents you to try and save jobs! That's what your paying them to do! But---- If he ( Little) comes back with a $10.00@hr, pay cut, he knows that would be the death of the TWU!---- Am I a Union man?-----Yes I am! But not this Union! Do I advocate the AFL/CIO? I can't say it strong enough!------ HELL NO!!! You brought up the fact I'm exTWA, true! And what did the AFL/CIO do when two of their members had a dispute over seniority?---- Not a damn thing! ------ Now let's settle something else here. Am I retired? Yes I am! I have two retirement checks coming in. One from TWA, ( P.B.G.C.) ,one from AA.----- I worked for TWA for 33 years, AA for 7 years. Because of Carl Icahn, and the IAM, my check from AA is bigger than that from TWA! Now, you figure it out if "I got mine!" Oh! I presume you know our retirement with AA started in 2001.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top