FrugalFlyerv2.0
Veteran
- Oct 29, 2003
- 2,931
- 3,341
Ooooh, the personal insults.
How deeply into your mental horsepower did you have to grasp to come up with that?
Speaking of the Whole Truth, let's have a look at it:
+1
Spin away!
How deeply into your mental horsepower did you have to grasp to come up with that?
WorldTraveler said:again, you are nothing more than a jealous little twit that has to insert yourself into conversations that other people are discussing. You are NOT AWESOME.
what FWAAA said and what you tried to connect with me aren't even close to being related.
And FWAAA's comment doesn't change that Washington could care less about WN's perceived need and Texas' LUV affair with them.
Speaking of the Whole Truth, let's have a look at it:
WorldTraveler said:WN is not exempt from antitrust guidelines and the fact that the case is being tried in Washington DC and not Texas says that the rest of the world is not nearly as intoxicated with or influenced by the hubris that N. Texas has tried to convince itself of regarding DAL.
^^^^^^^^FWAAA said:Uhh, No. Southwest petitioned the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which is where litigants usually attack agency positions like this one of the DOT. That the court is located in Washington, DC doesn't "say" anything about the world's intoxication (or lack thereof) with Southwest. It's merely where the courthouse is located.
There is no trial - this is an appellate court. Briefs will be filed followed by oral arguments of the legal issues by legal counsel for WN, DOT and DL.
This paragraph of yours is symptomatic of the things you fabricate.
+1
Spin away!