screwed,
for anyone to argue that airlines haven't been fully capable of cutting labor costs in BK regardless of union or non-union status is just ludicrous.
There is abundant DOT data accessible in the airline data project of MIT which shows that from 9/11 thru 2009, the amount of overall salary and benefit cuts by network airlines was lowest at AA, then CO neither of which filed for BK in the decade of the 2000s, followed by DL, then NW, then UA, and then US.
Further, US employees have had the largest cuts because they have been in BK twice in the decade... and labor at US has yet to return US employees to comparable levels.
Again, salary and benefit cost information is well reported to the DOT.
If the timeline was pushed out to include AA's BK, then the results would be rearranged but everyone gets the point including AA employees.
It is time for the airline employees to start regaining and the airline industry is better positioned for profitability now than it has been for decades. AA/US will have to deal with the headcount overages they have relative to other carriers but the vast majority of the employees do have the potential for a more stable labor environment than they have seen for years.
AA, like every airline has its strategic challenges but they do continue to have solid revenue generating potential and they also have advantages which are not matched by other carriers.
AA's results ARE a positive step forward and lay the groundwork for a bright future for the company and all of its stakeholders, including its employees.