Question; I noticed in your (or it may have been CALs) contract you have language to explore the possibility of a geographical premium, but EWR is not listed as one of the cities that would get it. Why is that?
EWR is essentailly NYCs third major airport. Its the closest airport to lower Manhattan, the Financial district , even closer than LGA and much closer to any point in Manhattan than JFK. So business wise EWR may have made more sense than reestablishing a big presence in SFO where costs are very high, probably higher than NY, but the city itseslf isnt very big compared to NYC #14 vs #1.
I spent the last couple of days deep sea fishing for albacore with no internet. It looks like you all had a very interesting weekend, but I was right here in SFO. No, I am NOT Mr Petrovsky, but I appreciate the compliment. Rich is a very decent person who has been active with the union for most of his 40 something years as a mechanic for UAL. He is probably not perfect, but does his job well. I have no problem with the performance of either of our two SFO Business Agents. But it seems that xUT, who is no longer even with UA, does. I guess in politics everyone is up for attack. Especially on this board.
Bob, according to the online CO agreement, article 15 N provides for a committee which will determine the cost of living in each of the cities in which technicians and related are based. The UA agreement has the same language and in addition calls for a company study on the highest priced US cities where UA mechanics are based. I do not see where you conclude that EWR is
NOT included?
We had the same problem here when AA bought TWA, TWA had guys on the street while AA was hiring non-TWA guys off the street. They said they wanted to avoid confusion when it came to integrating seniority. I think they just wanted a bigger pool of mechanics that they could draw from for recall. having guys on recall does have some benefits to the company especially with the shortage of mechanics thats developing. Delta, AA and others may be reluctant to hire a Laid off CAL guy (figuring by the time they get done training he will leave to go back to CAL/UAL) and hiring the guy off the street also denies competitors the opportunity to hire that mechanic, CAL also gets a guy at starting rates so it lowers costs, in the end UAL may end up with both.
It will be interesting to see how many mechanics actually are laid off at AA. Dumping mechanics at the bottom of the list raises costs and will be to the advantage of AAs competitors who will be able to add experienced guys at starting rates to their workforce and lower their costs.
There are multiple factors at work as far as mechanics. Airlines are getting more involved in the recruitment of mechanics into A&P schools, a new development. It would be in our interests to inform these kids what they have to look forward to. The biggest problem the airlines are facing is the age of the average mechanic, (I was amused by the ADVIL commerial, they got it right) on the one hand because we are so old they feel like they can #### all over us and we wont leave, (their bean counters still havent figured out how this ends up costing them, they only see what they think they can save) but on the other hand because they have trashed the job there isnt much interest from the younger generation to go into the profession. With the average age of an airline mechanic well into the 50s they will likely have to replace half the workforce in the next five years. Nights, weekends and Holidays with minimal PTO and crappy pay and no real incentive to stay (no pension or retiree medical) will mean that most of those they swindle into investing in their tickets will walk away from the Airlines before the even become proficient, much like we had at AA in the late 80s. those who stay in the profession may find they may be able to do better in GA without all the hassle that working for a major Airlines brings.
You of course are entitled to your opinion, even if it is riddled with over reaching bizarre explanations. The actual reason for one airline hiring while the other still has mechanics on lay off is elementary. Even though we are classified as one airline, we are still separate in many ways including our individual contracts. We are still operating under two contracts, UA and CO, (not to mention the MCI group) and will continue to do so until we all settle on a single agreement. It is that simple.
Each of our contracts protects the seniority of that group. This will remain until we have one single seniority list and one single contract. Eventually, we will be combined using date of hire. Those furloughed mechanics will then have rights to bid any new openings in the new single group using their former seniority. As it stands today, a UA mechanic can not carry his seniority to CO and vice-a-versa. When the combination does eventually happen there will undoubtably be former UA employees on the street with more seniority than some former CO mechanics working at a station.
However, this scenario would be the same even if there was no merger. It is a simple fact that there are areas within the airline that these senior employees on the street do not want to work for a variety of reasons. The company then hires. This has been going on for decades. UA has furloughed in one city and hired in another creating the same scenario you are twisting in to a fabricated crisis.
You guys are really scarping the bottom of the barrel this week.