NYGiantsFan90
Corn Field
- Oct 23, 2003
- 246
- 41
- Banned
- #46
Now he admitted to multiple affairs over the past 20 years and he had the nerve to attack Clinton?
What a hypocrite.
What a hypocrite.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now he admitted to multiple affairs over the past 20 years and he had the nerve to attack Clinton?
What a hypocrite.
How's that vote for change working out?
Will Mr. Sanford go to Washington?But unlike many other Republican politicians of his stature, Sanford recognizes that there are limits to ambition, that government treasuries are not bottomless, and that no ideology can captain the globe. If the promise of “hope†in the form of bailouts fails to revive the American economy, Mark Sanford will be the GOP’s most dangerous man in 2012.
As part of the Gingrich Revolution in 1994, Sanford pledged to serve just three terms. His explanation for the self-imposed limit reveals the two sides of his personality, the brainiac and the bumpkin. He says, “The ‘beta’ is the correlation between an individual stock and the market as a whole. Term limits change the beta of a political decision. Some politicians look at a single political decision and say, ‘Man, this could affect my career for the rest of my life.’ But with term limits, if it only affects you for the next two years, it’s not a life-changing event.â€
Now he admitted to multiple affairs over the past 20 years and he had the nerve to attack Clinton?
What a hypocrite.
Change like this Dude???
Will Mr. Sanford go to Washington?
From The American Conservative magazine.
generally it seems they just end up resigning.Personally, I think anyone caught fooling around ought to be canned right then. Not for any moral issue, but for being so blood stupid. Anyone that stupid should not be in public office serving the public good. I know they are all leaches but in theory a public servant is just that, someone who is supposed to server the public good.
Personally, I think anyone caught fooling around ought to be canned right then. Not for any moral issue, but for being so blood stupid. Anyone that stupid should not be in public office serving the public good.
what ends up happening is simply people start questioning their decision making abilities. if a public servant is making very poor choices in their personal life, it can also be said or generally..viewed they may also make poor decisions while serving the people they represent.Any POTUS who thinks he/she can play the field with out getting caught is too bloody stupid to be a public servant.
a law more than likely would never be necessary.. as most who are caught in those types of situations, may find it difficult convincing the voters.. during a time of re-election or another election to vote for them. (generally the public embarrassment is enough for them to resign)Having said that there is no way I would support any law that authorizes the removal of a person from office for infidelity.
I wonder how many more people would have supported "Democrat" during the 2000 election had the "Monica" situation never happened. you know it may have affected some people to vote the other way..As Dignity said, most end up resigning from office. Clinton was in his last term when it all hit the fan.
Yep. Theoretically I think he should have been run out of town. Any POTUS who thinks he/she can play the field with out getting caught is too bloody stupid to be a public servant.
what ends up happening is simply people start questioning their decision making abilities.