Thats 416.00 a year at .20 for a 40hr week. Thats not better than 800.00
Seems to me those on VF should be included also.There the ones that took the hit so others could work.So now the junior guy profits off the senior guys back.Why did the company not include them.And why is the language so confuseing most people didnt even know what it ment.
Also why is the company starting rumors that Doug can make the west side go under the east contract,He cant do that.And he knows it.
And when are sec 6 negotiations going to start for the west fleet.
Allstrike,
I've heard the IAM spread the rumors also with written goofy scenerios.
Allstrike and fellow IAM brothers and sisters, don't get 'hoodwinked' into Hayden's juvenile 'sidebar skit' regarding profit sharing. Your company may make $1 billion this year pre tax and your profit sharing has already been negotiated. Actually, your COC was already negotiated also.
The truth is that all Mr. Hayden did was agree with United Airlines' Canale, and appease your company by taking things already negotiated and pimp them off so your company can avoid the following:
1. Avoid the COC and its potential $627 million payout. In fact, Mr. Hayden isn't even a lawyer but he plays down the worth of the arbitration, even though the company's "Top" law firm sez in court documents it would cause 'severe harm' to stakeholders.
Mr. Hayden's convenient agenda forces him to avoid making statements about possible back pay, 4.5% pay raises, etc. He has failed to give the membership information about the 'merits of a binding arbitration appeal' should your company appeal an award from binding arbitration under the RLA. He has conveniently failed to mention penalties and further monies that could be obtained with an award if your company violates its obligation. He has failed to recognize the 'inclusion' of west side workers and that the $627 million amount includes them. Parker recognizes the cost, his own attorneys recognize the cost also, why doesn't Hayden?
2. avoid section 6 [section 6 is why you have a union to begin with, otherwise why pay dues]
3. avoiding lost synergies of having separate contracts.
Mr. Hayden 'paved the way' by agreeing to wipe out those 3 things your company has been postponing and avoiding like the plague. Then he appeased the company by collaring his very own members with an additional 2 years of a bankruptcy Judge abrogated contract.
What is sad, but very telling is the one thing I haven't heard Jeff say. Has he said that he brought back a fair and equitable agreement? All he has done is use business techniques in presenting his self manufactured 3 scenerios, which he basically throws his hands up and sez this one is better than the others. Puh leeeesssseee nuff already!
97% of his own membership will say the contract was not fair and equitable, but I haven't heard Jeff say that. I have a problem with that. It shows that Jeff has an agenda and most importantly that he isn't listening.
Parker needs to hear, 'screw transition until we get a fair and equitable contract'. If Parker sez "screw you then", then Parker will continue to have a pissed off like hell workforce. It won't matter how many additional workers he hires in PHL, it will be the same results.
Brothers and sisters are pissed off like hell and I believe they will see this thing to the end until they get Parker to show them the dignity and respect they deserve. If he doesn't know how to do that then he will have himself to blame. If fleet service can't get a contract with dignity then it won't matter how many more employees your company hires....it will continue to have the same problems it has been trying desperately to correct.
At any rate, transition agreements also give the company more flexibility in pursuing mergers and other financial transactions. And did you know that you can work under separate agreements for the next 30 years? Such a situation will blow up all the synergies that the merger was suppose to create. What investor would invest if Parker doesn't have the ability to bring two workgroups together. Folks, your company has a problem, it has not realized the full synergies that the merger was suppose to create. For the IAM to just drop a transition agreement on a silver platter and deliver it to Parker, without regard to justice, is treason against the member. I have a problem with that and I believe 99% of the members do.
Screw transition without a fair and equitable contract. If your company sez it will keep things separate then fine, keep things separate, keep your dignity and respect, and force your company to enter section 6 negotiations in 15 months. Also, force the company in section 6 negotiations immediately for your brothers and sisters on the west. I'm tired of Hayden, Canale, and the other suspects saying "The company sez this, the company sez that'. Rampers already know what the company will say since the company has been saying it for years. The westies should be all over Hayden to force him to finally enter section 6 negotiations for them. He's on the negotiations team, he should be advocating this for you. The IAM has d*cked around for over one year and has NOT FORCED PARKER TO THE TABLE [I smell Jerry Glass all over this].
The IAM and Mr. hayden have only agreed with Parker that the west should lose most of their benefits for wage bait, and Mr. hayden also agreed to 'timebomb' negotiations where 19 of the west side stations may very well be eliminated in 3.5 years.
The truth that Hayden doesn't seem to realize, is that the ramp is not stupid and Jeff brought back the most ridiculus contract ever, a contract that was rejected by over 95% of his own people. A contract that was so beat up that it could only muster a 35% Yes vote, even though the IAM was hard at work with its manufacturing 'spin' machine.
Thank God for the leaders who stood up in PHL, In CLT, IN PIT, In TPA, IN FLL, In BOS, In DCA, In LGA, and rooted out the IAM's latest treason.
regards,