OP
jeff hayden
Member
- Aug 22, 2007
- 46
- 0
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #226
Tim I dont know where you get your information, but stating that the IAM has refused to bargain in section 6 for the west is definitely not true. Once again that is something that I dont think I will be involved with so I dont know what game you are talking about. I was on the nego. comm. for the TA thats it. please your are really wasting my time. If any west members have questions on this I would suggest you contact your AGC and get some accurate information. If you are having trouble with getting answers, let me know and I will help you. jeffJeff,
You do well to mention that the IAM's duty is to enforce the contract. But since the TWU served a section 6, the IAm was duty bound to enforce that part of the contract also. The IAM has failed in this by refusing to bargain in section 6 for the west coast stations. 1.5 years after the TWU/IAM agreement on May 9th, you and Canale have not enforced the TWU agreement by enforcing section 6. You guys played around with the east coast arbitration. You owe those workers out west an apology, how would you like it if a union that nobody voted for or wanted came on the property and then shelved section 6 negotiations? The west is getting educated Jeff, and they are on to your game.
Did you inform them that you had to enforce section 6 since it was already served?????
regards,