QIK /SHARES migration

Who are the testers? People in the IT department? That's part of the problem. The people testing the system should be and must be people who use the system everyday on the front lines.
 
I had the same problem at DCA Thursday and BWI Saturday I could not check in on the Kiosk it would give me the Microsoft Screen of Death or a Debug error although it spits out my Baggage Tags it's still a fricking shame we didn't get boarding passes cuz the BWI crowd sure wasn't nice as the DCA crowd at checkin.

What did the message box say?

Any feedback can be helpful and passed on to the team that works on it.
 
The box says;
'RUN TIME ERROR 13'
Or something like that. I'm pretty certain that is what it says.
 
The box says;
'RUN TIME ERROR 13'
Or something like that. I'm pretty certain that is what it says.

Thanks! Really appreciate the feedback. 'Run time error 13' is something we have been looking at but it's nice to have a confirmation.
 
Improving Staffing means higher costs. Another example of how the knowing only the price and not the value in a decision leads to the high cost of cheap.

*If a G/A can on average process a customer in three minutes each with SABRE and SHARES takes a mere 15 seconds longer US raises its Labor cost associated by a little over 8%. Now take 8,000 G/A's, T/A's and associated reservations and increase their averages wage by 8% and you come up with $24,320,000.00 in additional cost WITHOUT adding in benefits and overhead costs.

Now IIRC US stated SHARES would "Save" 25 million annually. What we now see by their own admission is that SHARES is not cheaper by any stretch of the imagination or accounting method. Sorry but I call this lying to the customer and investment community.




*Numbers regarding average wages were taken from a published survey that stated agents earned on average $38,000 per year.

Not to mention the actual hardware and associated software seems to always have an issue, and time is spent waiting for the equipment to accomplish its task (extremely slow vs Sabre software,comparatively),or to fix said equipment that seems to be at the end of its life cycle.(JUNK)
.
 
Keep Looking! Maybe you'll find an IT department that realizes that the customer pays YOUR salary. You certainly don't have one now.

Whatever, I expect negative comments here from miserable people.

It would be nice if you for once let 2 people discuss an error and how to fix it. I'm trying my best to help the team responsible.
I know the kiosks are important for the agents.

You should be happy that someone is trying to make things better, but instead you continue your miserable mantra. It gets old.
Is that your point in life to bring everyone down as low as you are.

It almost sounds as if you're from a competing airline.
 
Oh so you know I'm miserable? How pleasant! Ever stop to think it might have something to do with your company? Remember US Airways gave me over $1000 in vouchers, an air check and two Envoy upgrades think they dit because I'm a nice guy? NO they did it because I had legitimate issues. Some of which to their credit they have diligently worked to rectify. Some to my total satisfaction and some that are "Work Arounds" due to the IT issues that continue to plague US Airways.

Why don't you explain how I have to e-mail my intinerary to someone in Tempe to "fix" on every flight because your wonderful reservation system can't pull a phone number from a specific data field, which causes me to get stuck in the TSA "watch list" due simply to a common name? Funny thing is this doesn't happen on CO, NW or UA. Just with US and all of their frightening IT talent.

I'm due to return a phone call from a major media outlet for comment regarding the recent improvements in on-time performance and I was seriously thinking of being extremely complimentary of US and their efforts. But since I'm so negative and miserable I'm rethinking my statement. Think I'll see if I can work in a very negative comment about IT.

Negative to me is complaining for the sake of complaining. IT improvement has been at best marginal and yet we as customers keep hearing "We're Working on it". Well if the system was so all fired great grand and wonderful in the first place why would you be working on it 3 years later?????

Pull your head out dude! I'm part of the captive audience in PHL and I'm not happy about it. Unlike others who suffer in silence, I will indeed suffer by I will NEVER be silent. You don't like being held accountable by your customers????? TO BAD GET USED TO IT!

No, you're miserable alright. If you remember, the original post were about 2 people trying to improve things. This should be a good thing to see that someone is trying to make things better. Instead, you come along with your wet blanket.

Then your latest post comes out with this over the top rant about QIK which is had nothing to do with the kiosks.

As far as QIK goes, we all agree it sucks and needs to be replaced. If the merge goes through, all this will be a moot point. QIK will then die off and IT will look like geniuses because they got by with an inexpensive system for the time being until the master plan got executed.

Tell me when the media releases the story and a link to the story or video. I somehow think you're just BSing. Why would anyone want to talk with you?
 
Think again buckwheat! Link forthcoming.

Typical Tempe, Never actually address the issue. Instead blame the customer. Have a delightful US Airways Day!!! I just got off a fabulous flight with a first class flight attendant who has a much firmer grasp on customer satisfaction than you will have as lonf as you have a hole in your arse.


From my understanding QIK didn't suck until US Incompetent Technology got hold of it. It's supported by EDS and SABRE, so the blame, er accountability would fall on that frightening talent in Tempe.

You truly are insane. Who's blaming the customer?

Just stay out of any conversation I have with an agent trying to help me. Keep your miserable attitude out of it. Meanwhile I have things to do to make the kiosks work and thus make the customers happy.
You wouldn't understand when someone is trying to help the customer as long as you have that hole in your head.

I have no association with the QIK code, but if it helps you to call IT incompetent so be it.
 
You truly are insane. Who's blaming the customer?

Just stay out of any conversation I have with an agent trying to help me. Keep your miserable attitude out of it. Meanwhile I have things to do to make the kiosks work and thus make the customers happy.
You wouldn't understand when someone is trying to help the customer as long as you have that hole in your head.

I have no association with the QIK code, but if it helps you to call IT incompetent so be it.

As someone who works and teaches IT, it's the appearance of the incompetence that causes it to be inferred. If I, as a customer, see the website doesn't work or a kiosk doesn't function, not just once but many times... and I know others see it too, the conclusion I make is obvious. I know Piney makes the same conclusion... many others do too.

The problem is that management denies there is a problem, often throwing it back at the customer as his problem (think IAK error).

For that matter, is anything even closely tested before it's released to employees or customers? (Again, reality makes the answer to this question as NO in the customer perception.)
 
Two of you in this thread are getting WAY too personal in your comments and insults.

It stops now. Discuss the issues all you want, but DO NOT MAKE IT PERSONAL.

NO warnings, just suspensions to follow, plus the thread will be closed.

Time to grow up people.
 
I'm not here to defend IT. I really don't care what people here say about it. If that floats your boat then fine. I personally do not have any responsibility for the code that's out there.

I was here because someone could help with information. I got the information I need so I can walk away from this happy with what I found out.
 
<SNIP> If the merge goes through, all this will be a moot point. QIK will then die off and IT will look like geniuses because they got by with an inexpensive system for the time being until the master plan got executed.
That’s been pretty much my reading of this the past year.

Tell me when the media releases the story and a link to the story or video. I somehow think you're just BSing. Why would anyone want to talk with you?
I’ve read Bob being quoted in the news media before, so it’s safe to assume there’s more to follow.
 
Phx__it,

Piney has been around for a long time as a customer. He is part of the FOCUS group, which is, to my understanding, a group of concerned ,if not ship wrecked customers that care about this airline. Not only about how their experience is as a customer, but the airlines ability to be an on going entity. It is, and I am sure I cannot entirely capture the feelings of these type of customers,(you know, the amount of money payed out to the company from these type of customers, to the bottom line(profit, operating expenses including salaries and or wages) is what the airline wants to depend on. At one time the marketing GIG was to reward passengers with their continued patronage with perks. Perks, along with service, expected, are now retreating(a creative way of underestimating it). In short, if my home town airline started cutting service, increasing prices, and developing substandard service, the service that I was accustomed to, I would be a bit grumpy too. To say the least. They depend upon the service in order to do their job. Which, to me, passionate, to some, doesn't quite cut it. I knew that feeling, once.

I want to help, but don't 'dis' Bob. You are fairly new, and to be fair, Bob did, IMO, excercise his last nerve, due to frustation or whatever. I could be wrong. I just hope the above dialoge will help put things in perspective, at least mine.
 
To add my 2 cents, Bob has ALWAYS defended the front line employees and has realized the QIK system has made their jobs a lot harder than it was or needs to be. As a former west employee I really had no idea the scope of what needed to be done and how inadequate SHARES was.-is. Bobs fight on this is our fight. Better technology helps our customers book with us( spend their money with US- via web, fon or ato), helps agents do their job which affects the bottom line by getting flights out on time (money for US) and allows for less stressed agents(less sick calls-more money for US) leading to better morale. Anybody remember the cutover? Having digested Bob's posts over the past few years, the frustration has turned to anger and some of us understand. Mama
 

Latest posts

Back
Top