Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have to disagree with you a bit on who was responsible for the PS plan. I believe the pilots showing their anger toward the company's greed the past few months may have played a part in the decision to implement (the most frugal in the industry) PS plan. Of course it couldn't just be for the pilots as the rest of the employees would hurt the bottom line with their dissatisfaction.eolesen said:Yep, I predicted about 15 minutes of labor peace from this announcement, and you guys proved it in 13.It's interesting that this isn't contractual. It's even more interesting to me that you guys piss and moan about losing something in 2003, and yet you're still working for AA and still paying the same worthless bargaining representatives. Mom used to say "crap or get off the pot". If you hate it so much, leave. There are others willing to take your place.The cold hard fact here is that the unions didn't get you your PS back.Management gave it to you. Sure, they could take it away, but I'd guess that this management team won't.Maybe it's time to re-think that union card. The guys at DL without one seem to be doing just fine.
Here's the difference.. DL has always operated non union. They treat people the way they do to keep unions off the property, except for the pilots. Now, to take a company which has been heavily unionized for decades and give them the gift of no unions, it will be like kids in a candy store for the company. It will not be the same culture.eolesen said:Yep, I predicted about 15 minutes of labor peace from this announcement, and you guys proved it in 13.
It's interesting that this isn't contractual. It's even more interesting to me that you guys piss and moan about losing something in 2003, and yet you're still working for AA and still paying the same worthless bargaining representatives. Mom used to say "crap or get off the pot". If you hate it so much, leave. There are others willing to take your place.
The cold hard fact here is that the unions didn't get you your PS back.
Management gave it to you. Sure, they could take it away, but I'd guess that this management team won't.
Maybe it's time to re-think that union card. The guys at DL without one seem to be doing just fine.
MetalMover said:Here's the difference.. DL has always operated non union. They treat people the way they do to keep unions off the property, except for the pilots. Now, to take a company which has been heavily unionized for decades and give them the gift of no unions, it will be like kids in a candy store for the company. It will not be the same culture.
It would definitely change the culture, but could it really be any worse?MetalMover said:Now, to take a company which has been heavily unionized for decades and give them the gift of no unions, it will be like kids in a candy store for the company. It will not be the same culture.
I beg to differ.eolesen said:It would definitely change the culture, but could it really be any worse?
And I'll disagree -- it won't be kids in the candy store.
If anything, the company would do what it could to avoid a future representation vote.
True, but DL has different management. To assume that other management who suddenly found themselves not having to deal with unions would be all open arms and do anything to keep everyone happy is assuming a bit too much.AirwAr said:
In reality, DL's non-union employees DO benefit from unions. The mere threat of the union "encourages" management to keep their non-union people on par.
In effect, DL's non-union employee groups are riding on the coat-tails of the union employees from other airlines.
AirwAr said:
In effect, DL's non-union employee groups are riding on the coat-tails of the union employees from other airlines.
Richard Anderson was at heavily-unionized Northwest from 1990 until 2004 and then in 2007, he became CEO of Delta, overseeing the merger of DL with his former company, NW. Upon his arrival at DL, he suddenly had a non-union workforce (except, of course, the pilots and dispatchers).MetalMover said:True, but DL has different management. To assume that other management who suddenly found themselves not having to deal with unions would be all open arms and do anything to keep everyone happy is assuming a bit too much.
By the time he became CEO pretty much all airline workforce was decimated everything was gutted already even non union DL. Plus he was trying to keep the unions out there were a few drives going on in those years. I agree with Metal given the opportunity the company would cut as many jobs as possible. How many airline jobs were lost the last twenty years? Oh and those Ready Reserves at 50% of the workforce is pretty sweet to management probably cheaper than a contract companyFWAAA said:Richard Anderson was at heavily-unionized Northwest from 1990 until 2004 and then in 2007, he became CEO of Delta, overseeing the merger of DL with his former company, NW. Upon his arrival at DL, he suddenly had a non-union workforce (except, of course, the pilots and dispatchers).
Is there any evidence that he has acted the part of "kid in a candy store" with respect to the DL workforce over the past nine years?
He may have stuck with the program coming off of freshly destroying the mechanics. And not rock the boat. Who knows. We currently have caps on outsourcing as per our labor agreements. DL can change that at will. Outsourcing creates job loss.FWAAA said:Richard Anderson was at heavily-unionized Northwest from 1990 until 2004 and then in 2007, he became CEO of Delta, overseeing the merger of DL with his former company, NW. Upon his arrival at DL, he suddenly had a non-union workforce (except, of course, the pilots and dispatchers).
Is there any evidence that he has acted the part of "kid in a candy store" with respect to the DL workforce over the past nine years?