Light Years
Veteran
- Aug 27, 2002
- 2,878
- 0
Excellent facility and geographic location or not, PIT is the loser hub in terms of O&D. Its also right beside, in fact in the same state as our only hub that has enough traffic to support one. The current US Airways route structure has never made sense and never will.
That said, there is no place for a US with only PHL and CLT (and the three focus cities) either. Both are too far East to really work as connecting hubs- this would just make the existing problem of having to go East before going West apply to even more cities.
If UA had been successful in purchasing U, PIT would have been a goner, with all of that midwest and western traffic routed through ORD, which makes alot more sense.
Aside from all of our current problems, these are basic flaws about the US Airways model that prove most peoples doubts about U as a stand-alone carrier. There is no money to move the assets or purchase another entity or parts of one, if there was there are few options in the midwest (which Siegel is correct about being overhubbed).
Our many PIT employees are some of the best and most dedicated. Sadly, if US stays all of those jobs are going to be poverty wage. The best option for the PIT airport is a small focus city for an LCC (Roam, AirTran) and more service from the other carriers. The US setup will be a monopoly over air travel with high prices for poor service, and then no contribution to the local economy with its working poor jobs.
That said, there is no place for a US with only PHL and CLT (and the three focus cities) either. Both are too far East to really work as connecting hubs- this would just make the existing problem of having to go East before going West apply to even more cities.
If UA had been successful in purchasing U, PIT would have been a goner, with all of that midwest and western traffic routed through ORD, which makes alot more sense.
Aside from all of our current problems, these are basic flaws about the US Airways model that prove most peoples doubts about U as a stand-alone carrier. There is no money to move the assets or purchase another entity or parts of one, if there was there are few options in the midwest (which Siegel is correct about being overhubbed).
Our many PIT employees are some of the best and most dedicated. Sadly, if US stays all of those jobs are going to be poverty wage. The best option for the PIT airport is a small focus city for an LCC (Roam, AirTran) and more service from the other carriers. The US setup will be a monopoly over air travel with high prices for poor service, and then no contribution to the local economy with its working poor jobs.