Oregon Shooting

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #376
KCFlyer said:
HIs favorite sources seem to be "It's obvious" and Squidward.
You just butthurt after I destroyed every myth and talking point you sputtered.

What else you got?
 
townpete said:
You just butthurt after I destroyed every myth and talking point you sputtered.

What else you got?
 
Hmmm...if anybody destroyed anybody, it would seem that I am still waiting for your "obvious" link to where the Denver shooter selected the theater because it was in a gun free zone.  
 
Google is indeed my friend....but the only places I can find that "prove" that played a role was gun nut sites that pointed out that he passed two other theaters.  You seemed to indicate that it was a "fact".  You even said
 The Colorado shooter (according to his notes) intentionally targeted that particular theater because he knew it was a designated gun free theater. He went out of his way to choose that theater over several others that where much closer to him.
 
I posted his notes....the words "gun free zone" wasn't in them.  At least, I didn't see them.  And all it would take,  since you KNEW that he put it in his notes,  would be to point out what page of the notes the I linked you to had the statement that this theater was chosen in large part because it was a gun free zone, even though it didn't make the "pros" column in his selection planning.  .  I gave you the freaking link to the notes  that you claim proved that.  .  Instead of pointing me to the page where he said that,  you go on a masturbatory spree posting pictures of semiautomatic pistols and how a housewife shot an intruder who snuck in while she was napping. 
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #379
Like I said it's rather obvious. That particular theater that was much more out of his then the others, was the only one who prominently displayed "GUN FREE ZONE".

Did the others?

No, they did not.

I don't expect you to grasp things this easy. After all you have some imaginary fear of "non automatic automatic guns".

Something that has never existed.

lol
 
townpete said:
Like I said it's rather obvious. That particular theater that was much more out of his then the others, was the only one who prominently displayed "GUN FREE ZONE".

Did the others?

No, they did not.

I don't expect you to grasp things this easy. After all you have some imaginary fear of "non automatic automatic guns".

Something that has never existed.

lol
 
What page of his notes did he say gun free zone?  Just the page number of the notes.  I'll find it if you give me that much.  
 
YOU said it was in his notes....not that he passed other theater, but it was in his notes.  .  Where in the notes?  Or did you just ASSume.  
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #383
Dog Wonder said:
You call that source, Even the NRA says it is suspect.
 
“The findings from this report are suspect and defy common sense," says Catherine Mortensen, a spokeswoman for the NRA, pointing to the discrepancy between the GSS findings and those of the Gallup surveys.
But still more then your baseless claim.

All this is found with a simple google search. But hey don't let me stop you from looking like an idiot.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/150353/self-reported-gun-ownership-highest-1993.aspx
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #384
KCFlyer said:
What page of his notes did he say gun free zone?  Just the page number of the notes.  I'll find it if you give me that much.  
 
YOU said it was in his notes....not that he passed other theater, but it was in his notes.  .  Where in the notes?  Or did you just ASSume.
It's on the same page as your "non automatic automatic guns".

lol
 
KCFlyer said:
Hmmm...if anybody destroyed anybody, it would seem that I am still waiting for your "obvious" link to where the Denver shooter selected the theater because it was in a gun free zone.  
 
Google is indeed my friend....but the only places I can find that "prove" that played a role was gun nut sites that pointed out that he passed two other theaters.  You seemed to indicate that it was a "fact".  You even said
 
I posted his notes....the words "gun free zone" wasn't in them.  At least, I didn't see them.  And all it would take,  since you KNEW that he put it in his notes,  would be to point out what page of the notes the I linked you to had the statement that this theater was chosen in large part because it was a gun free zone, even though it didn't make the "pros" column in his selection planning.  .  I gave you the freaking link to the notes  that you claim proved that.  .  Instead of pointing me to the page where he said that,  you go on a masturbatory spree posting pictures of semiautomatic pistols and how a housewife shot an intruder who snuck in while she was napping. 

You have him backed in a corner and all he will continue to do is try to weasel his way around the question by hurling insults and changing the topic. He is a coward. I stopped reading or responding to his BS and I recommend others do the same. Perhaps he will just fade into the shadows again.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #387
Ms Tree said:
You have him backed in a corner and all he will continue to do is try to weasel his way around the question by hurling insults and changing the topic. He is a coward. I stopped reading or responding to his BS and I recommend others do the same. Perhaps he will just fade into the shadows again.
But yet you still somehow respond to threads that I start.

lol
 

Latest posts

Back
Top