OP
strike facts
Member
- Sep 21, 2003
- 20
- 0
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #16
You people amaze me.
For the last 2 years the IAM has been telling you NEVER go to a judge because it will be bad things for the employees. Now you people seem to think that a judge is on your side.
This is what we know. The company has a very very strong case and even if it doesn't a judge will rule in the company's favor. But where will that leave those who are 'out'?
Get real to all of those who discounted the "acts of God, strike clause" If you guys think that the company won't invoke that clause even after a settlement with the IAM then you are all nuts.
The true facts are that the company will be more than happy to have a reason to go well below the 279 jet clause and will say that the strike impacted the operations and the company will not be fully recovered for at least 9 months. Who here doesn't think that will happen needs his head examined. I am 100% convinced that if the IAM strikes then the company will ground planes like it wanted to and cost thousands more jobs.
At any rate, any sympathizers or strikers who don't understand unemployment law and force majeure clauses will pay a dear price, and you will be able to thank the IAM for that.
What is more distressful is that this strike may give the company the avenue to liquidate. And it is completely asinine for all of those angry workers to cost 25,000 more jobs to go down the drain just because the IAM attorneys didn't cross the "t" in a very important contract clause.
And you are not a scab if you disagree with the IAM whose interest are probably in shutting US AIRWAYS down so United can fly out of bankruptcy because of 6% less seats in the sky and its 20,000 United airlines workers won't have to lose their pensions.
Management doesn't want this strike and that is true. But if the IAM strikes then the company has NO OPTION other than to close the doors resulting in thousands of good paying job loss, or ground a number of planes indefinately and leave those on the outside wanting in, plus other employees furloughed.
For the last 2 years the IAM has been telling you NEVER go to a judge because it will be bad things for the employees. Now you people seem to think that a judge is on your side.
This is what we know. The company has a very very strong case and even if it doesn't a judge will rule in the company's favor. But where will that leave those who are 'out'?
Get real to all of those who discounted the "acts of God, strike clause" If you guys think that the company won't invoke that clause even after a settlement with the IAM then you are all nuts.
The true facts are that the company will be more than happy to have a reason to go well below the 279 jet clause and will say that the strike impacted the operations and the company will not be fully recovered for at least 9 months. Who here doesn't think that will happen needs his head examined. I am 100% convinced that if the IAM strikes then the company will ground planes like it wanted to and cost thousands more jobs.
At any rate, any sympathizers or strikers who don't understand unemployment law and force majeure clauses will pay a dear price, and you will be able to thank the IAM for that.
What is more distressful is that this strike may give the company the avenue to liquidate. And it is completely asinine for all of those angry workers to cost 25,000 more jobs to go down the drain just because the IAM attorneys didn't cross the "t" in a very important contract clause.
And you are not a scab if you disagree with the IAM whose interest are probably in shutting US AIRWAYS down so United can fly out of bankruptcy because of 6% less seats in the sky and its 20,000 United airlines workers won't have to lose their pensions.
Management doesn't want this strike and that is true. But if the IAM strikes then the company has NO OPTION other than to close the doors resulting in thousands of good paying job loss, or ground a number of planes indefinately and leave those on the outside wanting in, plus other employees furloughed.