High Iron
Senior
- Aug 20, 2002
- 495
- 0
You're supporting your premise well enough, and I understand ( and have understood ) the theory, but it's the premise itself I have a problem with.
Did these top executives really "build" the company, or even arduously put their blood, sweat, and tears into it over the long haul? ( 10-25-20-25 years ) or are they itinerant hired guns?
We may have to agree to disagree here, but occupying an executive position doesn't necessarily imbue one with impeccable talent/wisdom/acumen. Ivory tower shennegins and bad decisions may not be the rule, but they sure have been numerous enough over the years to have a life of their own. Someone with less than ethical and moral principles may well find that taking the path of least resistance by assaulting the rank and file of a company may be personally beneficial to him/her and their immediate minions in certain ways, regardless of the longer term health of the enterprise....Then it's time for a new hired gun to see if there's any more milk to be had from the cow. Rinse and repeat.
Did these top executives really "build" the company, or even arduously put their blood, sweat, and tears into it over the long haul? ( 10-25-20-25 years ) or are they itinerant hired guns?
We may have to agree to disagree here, but occupying an executive position doesn't necessarily imbue one with impeccable talent/wisdom/acumen. Ivory tower shennegins and bad decisions may not be the rule, but they sure have been numerous enough over the years to have a life of their own. Someone with less than ethical and moral principles may well find that taking the path of least resistance by assaulting the rank and file of a company may be personally beneficial to him/her and their immediate minions in certain ways, regardless of the longer term health of the enterprise....Then it's time for a new hired gun to see if there's any more milk to be had from the cow. Rinse and repeat.