burghlaw1
Member
- May 13, 2003
- 76
- 0
Here is my spin on this issue: They cannot justify point-to-point flying from PIT under a hub-and-spoke model. Either PIT is a hub, or PIT is a city that will have only direct access to hubs.
I do not believe them when they say that PIT is unprofitable. If that is the case, they might as well shut down the operation and go away. How is it they can compete with LUV in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Philadelphia, but not in Pittsburgh? For those routes where US has the only direct service (and there are still a number of them), there is no reason for the routes not to be profitable. It's all posturing for the next wave of cuts
As to whether PIT can be a hub, I agree with JimmyNeutron when he says "Funny how all of the other majors manage to run mid-size hubs in mid size markets----including US in CLT----"
I do not believe them when they say that PIT is unprofitable. If that is the case, they might as well shut down the operation and go away. How is it they can compete with LUV in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Philadelphia, but not in Pittsburgh? For those routes where US has the only direct service (and there are still a number of them), there is no reason for the routes not to be profitable. It's all posturing for the next wave of cuts
As to whether PIT can be a hub, I agree with JimmyNeutron when he says "Funny how all of the other majors manage to run mid-size hubs in mid size markets----including US in CLT----"