Mechanics vote

Status
Not open for further replies.
There was only ONE vote on the final offer from the company in the latest bankruptcy.

The membership failed to vote 2/3 majority for a strike.

700, You know I am talking about the FIRST bankrupcy, The FIRST vote.
You know, The one the membership voted NO to the offer and YES to strike...No need to be so slippery 700, Theres a lot of people on this website that remember how this was handled.
 
I don't remember, but I believe they did vote to strike.

Not being slick, I have always talked about this CBA, not the 1st chapter 11 filing.
 
I don't remember, but I believe they did vote to strike.

Not being slick, I have always talked about this CBA, not the 1st chapter 11 filing.
You don't remember ??

How about this? If the membership voted NO to strike on the FIRST vote of the FIRST bankrupcy, There would of been no reason for the SECOND vote. :down:
 
You are beating a deadhorse.

The reasoning behind the 2nd vote:

The membership sent e-mails and phone calls to Siegel, Siegel said he would hold his own vote the district was against the 2nd vote. The international stepped in and did not want the company to run the vote.

And if the membership was not "confused" why did it ratify the 2nd time?
 
You are beating a deadhorse.

The reasoning behind the 2nd vote:

The membership sent e-mails and phone calls to Siegel, Siegel said he would hold his own vote the district was against the 2nd vote. The international stepped in and did not want the company to run the vote.

And if the membership was not "confused" why did it ratify the 2nd time?

Thats a blatant LIE. :down: The iam lied to the membership for 1 week about revoting, then they put out a memo that they agreed to revote the same pos contract.It had nothing to do with who was going to run the vote. Roach and Varsel made the call to revote the contract. :angry: You know thats the truth. And the company and the union spent the next week scaring all the weak sheepeople to vote yes or their job was gone.And you were in the clt union office sending 100's of emails out yourself begging for a revote saying you were confused. :( Don't make up stories how the iam handled it, they basically said the membership was to stupid(confused) to understand the consequences. You are one of the disgraceful sheeple still spreading lies. :shock:
 

Attachments

  • sheeple.jpg
    sheeple.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 160
The reason for the second vote, but you are beating a deadhorse.

One the membership sent e-mails and phone calls to Siegel, Siegel said he would hold his own vote the district was against the 2nd vote. The international stepped in and did not want the company to run the vote.

And if the membership was not "confused" why did it ratify the 2nd time?
Beating a Dead Horse ?

Examining the way a union handles a strike vote is not beating a dead horse..

I have never seen a list of e-mails or proof of phone calls to Siegel. [I do not doubt there were some, This membership does have it's share of jellyfish] But that is one LAME excuse to hold another vote on the same offer.

The reason it passed the second time was due to the "I'm Skeert" campaign that was put on by the IAM..[Pathetic].

I guess that I should of picked up the phone and called someone, Maybe there could of been a third vote, [Best 2 out of 3.. :huh:
 
I dont agree with the second vote, and it was not just a strike vote it was the ratification vote.

I saw some of the e-mails and was on the end of some of the phone calls to the local.

All I know is I voted no every single time.
 
Beating a Dead Horse ?

Examining the way a union handles a strike vote is not beating a dead horse..

I have never seen a list of e-mails or proof of phone calls to Siegel. [I do not doubt there were some, This membership does have it's share of jellyfish] But that is one LAME excuse to hold another vote on the same offer.

The reason it passed the second time was due to the "I'm Skeert" campaign that was put on by the IAM..[Pathetic].

I guess that I should of picked up the phone and called someone, Maybe there could of been a third vote, [Best 2 out of 3.. :huh:
You are exactly right on the money. The union wanted the revote and they made the call to have it. That move will ultimately come back to haunt the iam if there is a representation election. It will never be forgiven!! :angry:
 
Come on insp, do you think they are sheep?

They have brains and can use them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top