What's new

Man the lifeboats...............

American Airlines faces bumpy road getting back in the black

By D.R. STEWART World Staff Writer


AMR Corp.'s American Airlines struck historic deals recently to buy, over the next 14 years, up to 925 Airbus and Boeing aircraft worth $38 billion, but it doesn't ensure the Fort Worth carrier's survival, industry analysts and observers say.


With a 600-aircraft fleet averaging 15 years old - one of the oldest fleets in the industry - American needs new aircraft because fuel costs are eating its lunch, analysts say.


"They had no choice," said Fred Russell, CEO of Fredric E. Russell Investment Management Co. in Tulsa. "When you consider how many flights are canceled (due to aircraft repairs), leading to tremendous disgust and alienation by the public and loss of good will and revenue, they had to do something. Their planes are like the battlefield walking wounded."

But the company's problems run much deeper than the age and inefficiency of its aircraft.

American's difficulties include insufficient revenue, dismal management/labor relations and intense competition from healthier rivals, industry officials say.

"Clearly, this aircraft order is an investment in the future of the airline," said Alex Eaton, president of World Travel Service in Tulsa. "It's good for the company and its employees, it's good for the industry, and it's good for Tulsa.

"I wish, though, it was an indication of the good health and viability of the airline for the long term, but it's not. This is an indication of American Airlines' need to curtail losses in the short term."

Earlier this month, American's parent, AMR Corp., reported a second quarter loss of $286 million that included a second quarter fuel bill of $2.2 billion, a 33.1 percent increase compared with 2010's second quarter.

At the same time AMR reported its second quarter results, CEO Gerard Arpey announced the Airbus and Boeing aircraft orders, saying they would give American the youngest and most fuel-efficient fleet within five years.

But with more than $12 billion in losses over the past 11 years and long-term debt of $17.1 billion, the company is moving close to a financial precipice, industry analysts said.

"American can't really afford to do this, but they cannot afford not to do it," said Robert Herbst, industry analyst and founder of AirlineFinancials.com. "American's in serious financial trouble. They had to order these aircraft because without more fuel-efficient aircraft requiring less maintenance, American can't compete. In the end, it could break American, but they really can't afford not to order new aircraft," Herbst said.

Michael Boyd, an industry analyst, consultant and founder of Boyd Group International Inc. in Evergreen, Colo., said American can reverse its financial course by reducing its fuel costs and raising revenue through its joint business agreements across the Pacific with Japan Airlines and across the Atlantic with British Airways and Iberia.

"The joint business agreements with British Airways and Japan Airlines have not really been tapped yet," Boyd said. "There are two sides of the balance sheet. If they can get the fuel costs down and they can get the revenues up, I would reject the conclusion that American Airlines is automatically going under.

"I also reject the idea that they have to have a merger partner. There is no merger partner out there domestically. US Airways doesn't bring anything to the table."

Boyd and Herbst, both former American employees, said resolving the breach between management and labor is critical for American's survival.

Management/labor relations are at a low point as unionized mechanics, pilots and flight attendants have been unable to reach agreement with the company on new contracts after more than four years of negotiations.

American employs 6,000 mechanics and 7,000 people overall at its Maintenance & Engineering Center, its largest maintenance base, at Tulsa International Airport.

In 2003, the mechanics, pilots and flight attendants agreed to $1.6 billion a year in wage and benefit concessions to help American avert a bankruptcy filing.

All of American's major airline competitors filed for bankruptcy protection from creditors, canceled union contracts and slashed wage rates.

Herbst said American's management deserves most of the blame for the deterioration in morale among employees and the hostility between labor and executives.

"In the 1990s, American Airlines was known as the businessman's airline. Flight attendants were trained and catered to the premium passenger," Herbst said. "All flight attendants working for American today were hired before 9/11, and they were trained to think they would have 60 to 70 percent load factors (percent of seats filled).

"I fault American's management, which never went to the employees to tell them that we are no longer a premium airline and we're going to have to change to a low-cost airline - it isn't going to be like it used to be. A lot of employees don't understand what happened. They tend to see the industry through their tunnel vision. Management could have had great impact by selling employees on what was happening, but there is so little contact between management and employees at American that there is no airline with worse management/labor relations."

Boyd credits American's management with integrity for not filing for bankruptcy in 2003.

"It would have defrauded lenders, employees and employee pension funds," Boyd said. "But management/labor relations are important because if you don't have the employees behind you, you're dead. Unless the employees feel they are part of the company, they won't perform."

The onus is on American's management to turn around the state of management/labor relations, Boyd said.

"It can be done, but it's going to take some reaching out," Boyd said.

Herbst said he sees a bumpy ride ahead for American, a proud company that traces its lineage to Robertson Aircraft Corp. in the 1920s.

On one side, a merged United Airlines and Continental Airlines will be nipping at its international routes. Delta Air Lines' merger with Northwest Airlines will provide formidable competition on other international destinations, and the merger of Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways will give American low-cost competition on domestic routes.

"I don't know if there's going to be room for American in the longer term," Herbst said. "There's only one way they can survive: if labor and management sit down, find a way to work together as hard as they possibly can to be competitive."

The alternative?

"We've seen TWA, Eastern, Braniff and Pan Am disappear because they failed to be competitive in this industry," Herbst said
 
"We've seen TWA, Eastern, Braniff and Pan Am disappear because they failed to be competitive in this industry," Herbst said.

Being competitive is relatively easy - all a company has to do is run itself as a real business and not a piggy bank for its elite.

Even if that were done, management/employee relations are capable of taking down a company that does everything per the expectations of Wall Street.
 
"Tremendous disgust" (by our customers) - indeed! Mis-mAAnagement can't get a plane parked on an open gate due to the ground crew layoffs and poor management. They sold off the parts and now struggle to get them to us when needed. They bring in outsiders to "manage" and can't manage to fire a slug when needed.

AA sucks and it is really embarrassing; so much so that I seldom admit being part of AA when not on duty, and never - NEVER - wear their logo or uniform to and from work.

Ok, so there's my rant. Your turn.
 
Boyd and Herbst, both former American employees, said resolving the breach between management and labor is critical for American's survival.

American's difficulties include insufficient revenue, dismal management/labor relations and intense competition from healthier rivals, industry officials say.

"Clearly, this aircraft order is an investment in the future of the airline," said Alex Eaton, president of World Travel Service in Tulsa. "It's good for the company and its employees, it's good for the industry, and it's good for Tulsa.

"I wish, though, it was an indication of the good health and viability of the airline for the long term, but it's not. This is an indication of American Airlines' need to curtail losses in the short term."


But with more than $12 billion in losses over the past 11 years and long-term debt of $17.1 billion, the company is moving close to a financial precipice, industry analysts said.

"American can't really afford to do this, but they cannot afford not to do it," said Robert Herbst, industry analyst and founder of AirlineFinancials.com. "American's in serious financial trouble. They had to order these aircraft because without more fuel-efficient aircraft requiring less maintenance, American can't compete. In the end, it could break American, but they really can't afford not to order new aircraft," Herbst said.

Michael Boyd, an industry analyst, consultant and founder of Boyd Group International Inc. in Evergreen, Colo., said American can reverse its financial course by reducing its fuel costs and raising revenue through its joint business agreements across the Pacific with Japan Airlines and across the Atlantic with British Airways and Iberia.

"The joint business agreements with British Airways and Japan Airlines have not really been tapped yet," Boyd said. "There are two sides of the balance sheet. If they can get the fuel costs down and they can get the revenues up, I would reject the conclusion that American Airlines is automatically going under.

"I also reject the idea that they have to have a merger partner. There is no merger partner out there domestically. US Airways doesn't bring anything to the table."

Boyd and Herbst, both former American employees, said resolving the breach between management and labor is critical for American's survival.


"I fault American's management, which never went to the employees to tell them that we are no longer a premium airline and we're going to have to change to a low-cost airline - it isn't going to be like it used to be. A lot of employees don't understand what happened. They tend to see the industry through their tunnel vision. Management could have had great impact by selling employees on what was happening, but there is so little contact between management and employees at American that there is no airline with worse management/labor relations."


Boyd credits American's management with integrity for not filing for bankruptcy in 2003.

"It would have defrauded lenders, employees and employee pension funds," Boyd said. "But management/labor relations are important because if you don't have the employees behind you, you're dead. Unless the employees feel they are part of the company, they won't perform."


The onus is on American's management to turn around the state of management/labor relations, Boyd said.

"It can be done, but it's going to take some reaching out," Boyd said.
a few notes:
Some of the brightest leaders and analysts in the industry have come from AA... that is a testament to how well run AA used to be....but there are still biases because those people were at AA, not the least of which is continuing to buy in to the notion that AA is in a position of moral superiority for not filing for BK....
whether AA did in a court of law or not, AA HAS extracted billions from employees just like other airlines did, AMR did participate in the same debt for equity process as part of its 2003 restructuring, and AMR's pension obligations are unsustainable... taking pride that AMR has not filed for BK denies the reality of what they have done in the past - which in some aspects is not much different from BK - and the fact that they are not financially stable yet....
you can argue about what AA did by not filing for BK when they actually return to a position competiitve with their peers and have managed to stay out of BK... this point in time is far too early to talk about what AA hasn't done - and still doesn't change the fact that their employees have still paid a price similar to what other employees incurred in BK - and in many cases are worse off because the morale - and earnings at some of those airlines has improved.

.
The aircraft order is a Hail Mary - failing to do it doesn't ensure AA's survival but they had no choice but to do it.
.
The fact that AA is doing the same things that other airlines have already done - ordering a practially new, fuel efficient fleet (CO) and deepening alliance relations (DL and UA) but other carriers continue to encroach on AA's traditionally strong markets which AA has not reversed....
Of course some people don't want to hear that DL's corporate revenues have grown by 24% but the reality is that AA is the biggest source of those contracts which DL has picked up - and DL's much stronger position in NYC is a big reason. DL's revenues in LHR, Latin America, and in NYC domestic markets is growing far faster than AA's and individual markets demonstrate that the article is right that AA has lost its hold on key business revenue. UA continues to command revenue premiums on most routes to/from Asia where it competes directly with AA and is growing its revenue share in key ORD markets - although AA's performance on ORD-PVG has also shown significant improvement recently.
AA has made some key advances with JL to/from Japan, but they are still the smallest of the 3 US carriers/alliances to/from Japan and while they have improved their own revenues, they don't appear to be taking revenue from anyone else.
AA's dominance in ORD-east coast domestic markets is under assault from a number of low fare carriers, including AA's own "partner" B6.
.
I was just in Texas and had conversations with several AA employees and your observation about lack of willingness to be known as an AA employee is far from unique, PhatSappy.
.
Just like the new national debt reduction plan, AA's efforts so far are a tiny down payment on a whole lot of work that has to be done to turn AA around.
.
I can already count the number of "I don't want to read this" votes to this thread - but that is simply an indicator of how badly some people are out of touch w/ the reality of AA's situation - and why I continue to bring my views to the table.
 
... snip

Just like the new national debt reduction plan, AA's efforts so far are a tiny down payment on a whole lot of work that has to be done to turn AA around.

... snip

... and, as has been shown, AMR's so-called "management" has no intention of making any kind of peace with the employees, rather, I believe they're hoping for the ability to do a merger with those across the small pond, leaving the employee problems to the new masters after failure bonuses were handed out, of course.

I'm not sure what it would take for me to believe anything this ship of fools might have to say. They've poisoned the very water they have to drink, so to speak. They've lost anything that might be construed as honor.

Today, the company has their pet union pleading with state lawmakers to not send 230 jobs to Texass - it's being presented as a loss to the community when the reality is the company wants a larger handout from the city and the loss of $10.5k in dues income per month to Local 514.

Anything they do, even reaching out to the employees, will be taken apart, piece by piece, looking for ulterior motives.

The helluvit is this all could have been avoided, not with raises but by an honest engagement with the employees - It's plain to see they chose to do otherwise and richly deserve the situation they find themselves in today.

I fail to see where the present mismanagement is capable of doing what's necessary to make a turnaround after having squandered 8 years of opportunity.

$3.91/share - $.21 @ 1222 cdt 2AUG2011

$3.85/share - $.27 @ 1338 cdt 2AUG2011
 
tulsa2011818446small.jpg


Too late for lifeboats I'm afraid.
 
We're on the upward tic, don't be fooled by company propaganda.

A simplistic look at that chart might lead someone to draw such an uninformed conclusion, but that's not the case.

AMR has already lost $250 million more so far this year (first six months) than AMR lost all of last year. Unless fuel costs plummet quickly (and stay there), AMR's full year 2011 net loss will likely be more than double the 2010 loss.
 
A simplistic look at that chart might lead someone to draw such an uninformed conclusion, but that's not the case.

AMR has already lost $250 million more so far this year (first six months) than AMR lost all of last year. Unless fuel costs plummet quickly (and stay there), AMR's full year 2011 net loss will likely be more than double the 2010 loss.

OK - so when is the Chapter 11 filing? Let's do it and be done with it.

The trend of the stock has been in a downward spiral for quite a while. Not sure why noticing/commenting on that fact is an "uninformed conclusion" but you're more than welcome to your opinion as we all are.

See? I didn't even say you were wrong as you do with everyone else.

Fuel costs have been the victim of the Fed's printing presses as has every other bit of inflation the USA thanks to George Bush and Henry Paulson (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) for the inception of the bailouts and the present resident of the "White" house that carried out the bailouts. No big surprises here.

After the Goldman Sachs engineered federal giveaway, our dollar lost 60% - 75% of its value. That's a fact regardless of how anyone attempts to spin it.

Was that a false trend for the uninformed to pick up on also?
 
OK - so when is the Chapter 11 filing? Let's do it and be done with it.

Dunno exactly when. I'm certain that it will happen within days of the first time lenders refuse to make further advances to AMR.
 
The trend of the stock has been in a downward spiral for quite a while. Not sure why noticing/commenting on that fact is an "uninformed conclusion" but you're more than welcome to your opinion as we all are.

See? I didn't even say you were wrong as you do with everyone else.

Was that a false trend for the uninformed to pick up on also?

Frank, odie01 commented upon the recent trend of smaller and smaller annual losses shown on the chart above, not the current stock price - at least that's how I interpreted his comment. Odie01 didn't appear to be commenting on the obvious downward trend of the stock price, but I may be mistaken.

Notice how the 2009 loss was much smaller than 2008 and that the 2010 loss was smaller still; my interpretation of his post was that given that favorable trend, 2011 would bring an even smaller loss (or perhaps even a small profit).
 
Dunno exactly when. I'm certain that it will happen within days of the first time lenders refuse to make further advances to AMR.

Bring it on. The sooner the better. AMR will emerge as a leaner, meaner and more conceptive player. They can restructure facility and aircraft leases, impose further concessions and get the company back on it's feet. Hopefully this will be a convenient way to end the APA duty restrictions and begin ultra long haul flying, evade scope clause and bring 100 seater jets on property. Of course as an unsecured AMR creditor myself it's unlikely my AAdvantage miles, refunds, credits, etc will take a haircut.

Josh
 
Yep, $3.82/share proves it!!!

The Dow fell over 500 points today and even Southwest hit a 20-month low:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/airline-stocks-fall-southwest-hits-19-month-low-2011-08-04?siteid=yhoof

Oil is down to just under $90/bbl but there's lots of other continuing problems.
 
Bring it on. The sooner the better. AMR will emerge as a leaner, meaner and more conceptive player. They can restructure facility and aircraft leases, impose further concessions and get the company back on it's feet. Hopefully this will be a convenient way to end the APA duty restrictions and begin ultra long haul flying, evade scope clause and bring 100 seater jets on property. Of course as an unsecured AMR creditor myself it's unlikely my AAdvantage miles, refunds, credits, etc will take a haircut.

Josh
now there is an obviously unbiased opinion... let AA employees bear the brunt of the force of a restructuring - while you walk away scot free.
.
Whatever benefit lower fuel prices bring is more than offset by the growing economic uncertainty in the US and Europe and the loss in wealth from the stock market that clearly drives some people's ability to travel.
.
This is shaping up to be the exact same economic situation that set up a change in control on Pennsylvania Ave not too many moons ago.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top