Overspeed
Veteran
- Jun 27, 2011
- 3,245
- 1,065
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
2ndGENAMT,
You should actually read the scope clause. What you believe is far from the truth. The language restricts outsourcing to 35% of the total of direct labor + material + outsourcing. Management is not included. Also, the language on outsourcing restricts AA to specific work that could be initially outsourced then only peak work can be sent out up to the 35%. AA is already at 25%. Most of the reductions now are driven by old aircraft being replaced by new ones. DL is better? Show the DL language that says they cannot outsource the remainder of engines? There isn't any scope or limits so if you are saying you want DL's heavy maintenance concepts in our CBA scope clause, Dougie will love you for it.
You should actually read the scope clause. What you believe is far from the truth. The language restricts outsourcing to 35% of the total of direct labor + material + outsourcing. Management is not included. Also, the language on outsourcing restricts AA to specific work that could be initially outsourced then only peak work can be sent out up to the 35%. AA is already at 25%. Most of the reductions now are driven by old aircraft being replaced by new ones. DL is better? Show the DL language that says they cannot outsource the remainder of engines? There isn't any scope or limits so if you are saying you want DL's heavy maintenance concepts in our CBA scope clause, Dougie will love you for it.