Chuck Schalk
Veteran
- Nov 17, 2006
- 1,042
- 1,149
all I can say is:
HAD ENOUGH YET?
HAD ENOUGH YET?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
I HAVE!!!Chuck Schalk said:all I can say is:
HAD ENOUGH YET?
Well we all have to consider what Overspeed's definition of "Job Security" is.swamt said:Overspeeds ratio is more important to him than job security.
Overspeed reminds me of Baghdad Bob who was on the TV during the Iraq war telling the world all there were no Americans in Iraq...Bob Owens said:Well we all have to consider what Overspeed's definition of "Job Security" is.
MetalMover said:Overspeed reminds me of Baghdad Bob who was on the TV during the Iraq war telling the world all there were no Americans in Iraq...
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/jokes/bljoke-iraqinfominister.htm
Overspeed said:
My definition of job security is one that makes labor so valuable that AA cannot make money with out our unionized work force. Meaning that we are the best trained, most efficient AMTs in the business. IMHO telling mgmt we will deny AA our services is not a viable option. It is an all or nothing approach. Ask AMFA how that worked out at NWA. Did you know that our new MX VP is formerly from NWA? How many people truly believe that the NMB will let airline workers strike now given there are only four major airlines?
So what are the options? Vote AMFA and capitulate on the overhaul is worth fighting for argument? That's what has happened at all other major airlines by either breaking existing scope clauses (IAM/UA and AMFA/NWA) or by never fighting for overhaul in the first place (AMFA/WN and IBT/US)
But hey, the members that lost their jobs at NW, US, and UA love the great contracts that allowed their jobs to be outsourced. The new CBA at AA does provide more protection than any of those at the other majors.