Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, He could have held TWU Informer's hand in the lobby.mojo13 said:Damn Bob, I sure wish you would have come to the debate that we had in Tulsa. You could have really shined there.![]()
Ken there are several reasons that Jim didn’t post his letter him self. One of the biggest reasons is the obvious fact Jim has a few thousand other members to answer to everyday. You act as though he Jim should be there at your beckon call, well Ken it doesn’t work that way. You act as though I should be ashamed of being loyal to Jim Little; well I’m not ashamed Ken. As for the half-truths I suppose it depends on how big of a pair of blinders your wearing that day, you do understand the bigger the blinder the smaller your vision. I suppose half-truths are in also a particular persons ability to define what is factual and what is total fiction. I find it very disturbing that in today’s world that there is a large number of people with limited vision. Again if you were Jims only member he would be able to drop everything deal with your every whim. And one of the last but not least is the fact that the man is trying recover from cancer or did you conveniently forget about that fact? Ken now that Jim answered your questions, enough is enough.Ken MacTiernan said:Kirk, thank you for your post. I asked a question and you answered it. I do not know why jim thought I would have altered his, or any response I receive from the twu. Nice to know how jim thinks of me. I am not a dishonest person Capt. Kirk. I believe in a craft democratic union for OUR profession. I believe that when I speak people should know who I am and where I am from. Basic virtues of being taken seriously.
Your posting responses from jim might seem like a loyal trait but what happens when you post half truths and lies on behalf of jim?
Like you said, it is a shame that jim must have others post his responses to others instead of himself. Why does jim not simply make the posts himself? Just another question.
Oh yes Ken let us not forget the fact you did not grant Jim Little the common courtesy to allow him time to answer before you posted your letter on the internet.James T. Kirk said:Ken there are several reasons that Jim didn’t post his letter him self. One of the biggest reasons is the obvious fact Jim has a few thousand other members to answer to everyday. You act as though he Jim should be there at your beckon call, well Ken it doesn’t work that way. You act as though I should be ashamed of being loyal to Jim Little; well I’m not ashamed Ken. As for the half-truths I suppose it depends on how big of a pair of blinders your wearing that day, you do understand the bigger the blinder the smaller your vision. I suppose half-truths are in also a particular persons ability to define what is factual and what is total fiction. I find it very disturbing that in today’s world that there is a large number of people with limited vision. Again if you were Jims only member he would be able to drop everything deal with your every whim. And one of the last but not least is the fact that the man is trying recover from cancer or did you conveniently forget about that fact? Ken now that Jim answered your questions, enough is enough.Ken MacTiernan said:Kirk, thank you for your post. I asked a question and you answered it. I do not know why jim thought I would have altered his, or any response I receive from the twu. Nice to know how jim thinks of me. I am not a dishonest person Capt. Kirk. I believe in a craft democratic union for OUR profession. I believe that when I speak people should know who I am and where I am from. Basic virtues of being taken seriously.
Your posting responses from jim might seem like a loyal trait but what happens when you post half truths and lies on behalf of jim?
Like you said, it is a shame that jim must have others post his responses to others instead of himself. Why does jim not simply make the posts himself? Just another question.
Kirk, check you Personal Messages.James T. Kirk said:Oh yes Ken let us not forget the fact you did not grant Jim Little the common courtesy to allow him time to answer before you posted your letter on the internet.James T. Kirk said:Ken there are several reasons that Jim didn’t post his letter him self. One of the biggest reasons is the obvious fact Jim has a few thousand other members to answer to everyday. You act as though he Jim should be there at your beckon call, well Ken it doesn’t work that way. You act as though I should be ashamed of being loyal to Jim Little; well I’m not ashamed Ken. As for the half-truths I suppose it depends on how big of a pair of blinders your wearing that day, you do understand the bigger the blinder the smaller your vision. I suppose half-truths are in also a particular persons ability to define what is factual and what is total fiction. I find it very disturbing that in today’s world that there is a large number of people with limited vision. Again if you were Jims only member he would be able to drop everything deal with your every whim. And one of the last but not least is the fact that the man is trying recover from cancer or did you conveniently forget about that fact? Ken now that Jim answered your questions, enough is enough.Ken MacTiernan said:Kirk, thank you for your post. I asked a question and you answered it. I do not know why jim thought I would have altered his, or any response I receive from the twu. Nice to know how jim thinks of me. I am not a dishonest person Capt. Kirk. I believe in a craft democratic union for OUR profession. I believe that when I speak people should know who I am and where I am from. Basic virtues of being taken seriously.
Your posting responses from jim might seem like a loyal trait but what happens when you post half truths and lies on behalf of jim?
Like you said, it is a shame that jim must have others post his responses to others instead of himself. Why does jim not simply make the posts himself? Just another question.
No Ken, you are not skilled or professional at anything but being or pretending to be a demagogue.Ken MacTiernan said:Kirk, check you Personal Messages.James T. Kirk said:Oh yes Ken let us not forget the fact you did not grant Jim Little the common courtesy to allow him time to answer before you posted your letter on the internet.James T. Kirk said:Ken there are several reasons that Jim didn?t post his letter him self. One of the biggest reasons is the obvious fact Jim has a few thousand other members to answer to everyday. You act as though he Jim should be there at your beckon call, well Ken it doesn?t work that way. You act as though I should be ashamed of being loyal to Jim Little; well I?m not ashamed Ken. As for the half-truths I suppose it depends on how big of a pair of blinders your wearing that day, you do understand the bigger the blinder the smaller your vision. I suppose half-truths are in also a particular persons ability to define what is factual and what is total fiction. I find it very disturbing that in today?s world that there is a large number of people with limited vision. Again if you were Jims only member he would be able to drop everything deal with your every whim. And one of the last but not least is the fact that the man is trying recover from cancer or did you conveniently forget about that fact? Ken now that Jim answered your questions, enough is enough.Ken MacTiernan said:Kirk, thank you for your post. I asked a question and you answered it. I do not know why jim thought I would have altered his, or any response I receive from the twu. Nice to know how jim thinks of me. I am not a dishonest person Capt. Kirk. I believe in a craft democratic union for OUR profession. I believe that when I speak people should know who I am and where I am from. Basic virtues of being taken seriously.
Your posting responses from jim might seem like a loyal trait but what happens when you post half truths and lies on behalf of jim?
Like you said, it is a shame that jim must have others post his responses to others instead of himself. Why does jim not simply make the posts himself? Just another question.
I never stated that jim should be at my beck and call. I said that as an UNELECTED, APPOINTED officer of the atd that he should reply to questions by the membership... everyday. That is part of his responsibilities.
As for your being ashamed of being loyal to jim my point is that when you post something for someone, or even yourself, that is not factual you should be ashamed. Especially doing so behind an alias.
Your mention of blinders is very appropriate since the twu has kept blinders on the membership during concessions. I guess we were wearing the blinders produced by the "Full Revote" manufactoring company and distributed by the "SERP" distribution firm. My vision is not hindered Captain Kirk. As a matter of fact I can see clearly. I can see the twu's fear in being removed from representing our profession. I can also see clearly the cowardice of the twu by protwu posters using an alias. Why not state your names for all to see?
I am a skilled, professional AMT. And I act as such. I do not parade around open coffins and chant "Scab! Scab! Scab!" at fellow Brothers and Sisters in our craft and class simply because they wish to become better informed between the differences in industrail and craft unions. I am very aware of Jim's medical condition. Since you are a confidant of Jim's you should know of the tone of our conversations and that I have told him that I wish the best for him and his family. I do not wish Jim any ill will. I simply do not want him any where near our profession.
And for your information James Tiberius Kirk, I posted my letter to Jim so ALL concerned in the upcoming election will know what I wrote. I also forwrded my letter to people to keep everyone informed. There was never any stop watch started after the SEND icon was clicked. As for common courtesy if I was told I would have a full revote and then said I was not worthy of such a revote that would not be considered courteous? Even with blinders on?
The coffin stunt was a sophomoric act by the very people you are trying to convince to let AMFA represent them. That little demonstration was no worse than the mock cremation of the TWU negotiated T/A you held on a beach and publicised with plenty of posted images.
Sorry AwayFrmitAll,awayfrmitall said:Ok... Explain exactly how Little's letter when it states the same LIE at least 5 times is kicking anyone's butt? Anyone, who knows how to read can easily see that he is full of it...awayfrmitall said:RE: Jim Little's response
Maybe if they tell a lie enough they will believe it themselves... below is a link to an article. The few key parts to notice are as follows (I thought I should point them out since certain members of the TWU can't read long articles):
"The board believes that the business plan submitted by the company is not financially sound," said the ATSB in a statement Wednesday evening. "This plan does not support the conclusion that there is a reasonable assurance of repayment and would pose an unacceptably high risk to U.S. taxpayers."
The board added the plan is based on "unreasonably optimistic revenue projections."
"The board believes that with a more reasonable revenue forecast, United's revenues and costs still would not be aligned, even with the benefit of all proposed cost reduction initiatives," the board said.
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY!!!!
"The ATSB's Montgomery said that the panel considered the application as if the mechanics had approved the concessions package and all the promised cost savings were in place. "
Article on CNN Money
Do you TWU cultist really think that people are so uninformed that they don't remember the real story of what happened?
I am quoting the post above for you TWU faithful that are challenged when it comes to reading. PROVE to me that what Little claims in not a LIE...
Good luck...
Buck,Johnny Lunchbox said:Buck, my questions are for the AA members, and my questions are directed to AMFA's history after gaining bargaining agent at other airlines...does the membership know of AMFA's history? Do you Buck? I cannot and will not believe that everyone that is pro-AMFA is illiterate. Please Buck, what part of AMFA's history thrills you? This is not a test, this is a sincere question sir.