Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
actually I was thinking you and Josh are two reasons it's in the toilet.
for the record, if and when your beloved AMFA finally delivers and contract maybe you can talk junk about the assoc untill then I don't see much difference in the bottom line
Or you can become an AA employee and maybe someone will care about your opinion on all things AA
actually I was thinking you and Josh are two reasons it's in the toilet.
for the record, if and when your beloved AMFA finally delivers and contract maybe you can talk junk about the assoc untill then I don't see much difference in the bottom line
Or you can become an AA employee and maybe someone will care about your opinion on all things AA
I have already told you why I am here. Until it stops I will remain a thorn.
At least I come on here to challenge and bring important issues up that never get answered by your nego team. Just like the one that a mechanic just asked in the mechanics thread about how the seniority integration will go for CC's, Leads and inspectors. Will it go the IAM way or the TWU way? Will there be a grandfathered clause for all the current CC's, Leads and inspectors. This asso only puts out that the seniority issue is T/A'd, now HOW it was T/A'd, now why is that, and why aren't you fleet folks asking the same for the CC's, Leads and other cat seniority groups that will get affected by this decision? Why not give the info how things are T/A'd instead of leaving the membership fully in the dark until it's all too late and BAM, here's your T/A now go vote. Ask your NC that question cltrat, and see what kind of answer you get.actually I was thinking you and Josh are two reasons it's in the toilet.
for the record, if and when your beloved AMFA finally delivers and contract maybe you can talk junk about the assoc untill then I don't see much difference in the bottom line
Or you can become an AA employee and maybe someone will care about your opinion on all things AA
well at least 700 was an ex employee, WT was a douche bag something you should be able to relate toIf only 700 and WT were still around...
Josh
well at least 700 was an ex employee, WT was a douche bag something you should be able to relate to
actually swamt I get quite a few answers when I ask my NC team I just don't do it here
To my knowledge 700 never indicated or suggested he was a current or former employee of American Airlines.
Remember all the AMT treads during bankruptcy and before the merger?
Josh
Update
We have 2 sessions before the end of the year set which includes next week in DCA and the week of December 11th in DFW. The articles remaining include vacation, pension/401k, wages, duration, scope and insurance. There may be an article or two I'm missing. We have around 34 TA's. I put the chances of having a deal at 5% by the end of the year.
P. Rez
The old US Airways is now the New American Airlines.
700UW is what we call a Legacy Employee. You’re supposedly just some Banker out in the World who has a weird fascination with us here.
Highly unusual I must say.
Update
We have 2 sessions before the end of the year set which includes next week in DCA and the week of December 11th in DFW. The articles remaining include vacation, pension/401k, wages, duration, scope and insurance. There may be an article or two I'm missing. We have around 34 TA's. I put the chances of having a deal at 5% by the end of the year.
P. Rez