The IAM has never really released many details about negotiations. I'm not going to debate if that's the best approach or not
when the company releases a clear PR/propaganda piece in an obvious attempt to win over a tiny % of fsc/mx...everything (protocol, professionalism) goes out the window. then let gary peterson release the humiliating details. clearly, that would be the popular thing to do.
i don't feel it's the right thing. don't fuel animosity, where this thing drags out...and no side will sign on anything due to spite.
we know, through here, the wage front. for many, it is THE issue. aa, not the assoc., gave us a glimpse at some other stuff, 401k, for example (6% match + 3% company contribution). we know that catering is an issue for LUS.
the deicing outsourcing will eventually bite aa in the azz. of this, i have no doubt...i just don't want to lose these seasonal jobs to prove a point to aa. i was not surprised that freight and lavs would not be outsourced.
back to wages, aa conveniently forgot to tell us about dl/ua profit sharing..what the workers from these airlines have pocketed and what they will pocket. i know what they will pocket, because doug parker tells the world that aa is a $5 billion a year in profit airline, going forward. if so, dl is a $5.5 billion a year airline and ua is a $3 billion a year airline.
we need to get over this 3% over dl/ua hurdle. parameters set by the company should not be any road-map to a TA. that is the insulting part, as the company insists on herding us like sheep to where they wish to take us. 3% more than dl is preposterous, 3% more than ua is absurd.