What's new

JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.
pj, you make great points. So does Tim, on these issues. Now, on the twu side a lot of sovereignty was given up, with the b/k scope and association. The pension, being the number 1 issue for your international compromises everything you stand for. Its my belief, the company already knows what they're going to do, and in about a year to 18 months, things are going to get ugly.
Here's what will happen, iampf pension not this year, but next year will start hitting critical status. the progress on mx, and fleet, I don't comment on mx issues, contract will still be at a standstill. What will happen, is the company will do what they want on all these issues, due to the status of your pension. 1. scope will be more towards laa twu with more of your stations being grandfathered. 2. medical will be laa's. 3. Catering will be outsourced. Cargo will be saved. 4. we will have the same contract as United/continental. 5. Twu will be a shell of its former self, as it is now a forced member of the failing pension. 6. language on the contracts will be more toward yours in the key areas. 7.parttime will be increasing.8. mx will finally have the cards signed as they will be united with LUS mx. Lus mx, most members hate the iam, and its short comings as well, as they see the writing on the wall with their jobs being moved anyway.

That said if there is by miracle a contract this year, Twu must have caved on everything, but your medical is gone, catering too, and ready reserve /part time ratios have changed. the iampf is saved for 10 years, with massive cuts, in 18 months.
I'm guessing that the window between late September - prior to Thanksgiving will be critical. That's the window. If something doesn't happen then, then you can prolly count on these negotiations pushing section 6, in 9 months after that window. The IAM has to make its move prior to the 3rd pension cuts. And the cuts will happen whether the TWU members come in or not. The cuts have to be massive this time, just like last time. The reports heavily favor a complete elimination of all unreduced plans. I mean we can talk about benefit amounts and play the math game all day, but the bottom line is that us airline peeps in this plan will have to suck it up and be forced to work until at least 65. Forget about medical bridges since you won't be able to collect retirement until 65. Next to the biggest problem is the misguided assumptions in the IAMNPF since the Trustees have continue to use outdated assumptions which create massive losses in the plan. They are still using 7.5% interest when it should be lower, and they need to better estimate life expectancy as participants are living much longer than their very low assumptions. Because of these 2 items, the liabilities took an additional loss of $50 million. Another factor is that their estimate of the # of participants who quit or walk away prior to becoming eligible for retirement benefits is less than they predict. When LUS came into the plan, we were lucky insomuch that we came in immediately prior to the 2003 cut (actually 1 month prior). This kept us on the A schedule until the next cut. We also got service credit imputed.

I'm not sure what the plan will do for any new TWU prey. I'm guessing that they would imput service credit on them as well since it may not matter if they make new funding policies that eliminate the unreduced plans.

Whatever the case, defined pensions are gone. Stick a fork in them. The laws, etc., are killing these dinosaurs. Basically everyone wants your money and now everyone can take it from you unless you are 80 years old. That's the law. Everything else is too much of a pyramid to survive. The average age is old and unless we can convince a culture shift with millennials that they need to go back to the past and hand money to Pension bosses, we are in big league trouble. Simply unsustainable.

That said, I think PJ wants a new contract and deserves one. But neither him and me have to ditch our medical and small stations without grandfather rights. And no way in hell should we lose catering. It survived 2 bankruptcies and there is no reason why it should be blown up now. And God only knows I don't want any comparison to the United contract. That contract is a complete disaster. It's a company hand book. It has all the cosmetic things like wage, decent retirement, but lacks language, grievance procedure that has teeth, has unlimited part time, boatloads of Temp agents that hang around for 360 days, and no union rules at all.
 
I'm guessing that the window between late September - prior to Thanksgiving will be critical. That's the window. If something doesn't happen then, then you can prolly count on these negotiations pushing section 6, in 9 months after that window. The IAM has to make its move prior to the 3rd pension cuts. And the cuts will happen whether the TWU members come in or not. The cuts have to be massive this time, just like last time. The reports heavily favor a complete elimination of all unreduced plans. I mean we can talk about benefit amounts and play the math game all day, but the bottom line is that us airline peeps in this plan will have to suck it up and be forced to work until at least 65. Forget about medical bridges since you won't be able to collect retirement until 65. Next to the biggest problem is the misguided assumptions in the IAMNPF since the Trustees have continue to use outdated assumptions which create massive losses in the plan. They are still using 7.5% interest when it should be lower, and they need to better estimate life expectancy as participants are living much longer than their very low assumptions. Because of these 2 items, the liabilities took an additional loss of $50 million. Another factor is that their estimate of the # of participants who quit or walk away prior to becoming eligible for retirement benefits is less than they predict. When LUS came into the plan, we were lucky insomuch that we came in immediately prior to the 2003 cut (actually 1 month prior). This kept us on the A schedule until the next cut. We also got service credit imputed.

I'm not sure what the plan will do for any new TWU prey. I'm guessing that they would imput service credit on them as well since it may not matter if they make new funding policies that eliminate the unreduced plans.

Whatever the case, defined pensions are gone. Stick a fork in them. The laws, etc., are killing these dinosaurs. Basically everyone wants your money and now everyone can take it from you unless you are 80 years old. That's the law. Everything else is too much of a pyramid to survive. The average age is old and unless we can convince a culture shift with millennials that they need to go back to the past and hand money to Pension bosses, we are in big league trouble. Simply unsustainable.

That said, I think PJ wants a new contract and deserves one. But neither him and me have to ditch our medical and small stations without grandfather rights. And no way in hell should we lose catering. It survived 2 bankruptcies and there is no reason why it should be blown up now. And God only knows I don't want any comparison to the United contract. That contract is a complete disaster. It's a company hand book. It has all the cosmetic things like wage, decent retirement, but lacks language, grievance procedure that has teeth, has unlimited part time, boatloads of Temp agents that hang around for 360 days, and no union rules at all.


Tim you're writing wwwwwwaaaaaayyyyyy too much in your multi personalities now. Way too much.
 
Was he bonkers in person? Did you lie and say you had a flight coming in just to get away?


He was with a nice blond lady so he was pretending to be normal. It was a performance that would have made Sir Lawrence Olivier proud.
 
Do you know if the TA'd language allows for PTers to be held before FTers? And is the OT sign up still broken down by "Duty Assignments"?

not really I don't I asked about the bypass because I've been screwed by it a number of time and want to see admin held accountable.
Our ot is called by classification Crew chief, full time agent and part time agent, order determined by equalization hours (ot you have worked) just because you are already on property you are not ahead of someone not at work with less hours.
If say you are a D1 qualified agent full or part time you can sign up for Crew chief ot but a crew chief gets called ahead of you not matter what, likewise if I sign up for agent ot agent get called ahead off me no matter what.
We do not have a classification for D1
 
not really I don't I asked about the bypass because I've been screwed by it a number of time and want to see admin held accountable.
Our ot is called by classification Crew chief, full time agent and part time agent, order determined by equalization hours (ot you have worked) just because you are already on property you are not ahead of someone not at work with less hours.
If say you are a D1 qualified agent full or part time you can sign up for Crew chief ot but a crew chief gets called ahead of you not matter what, likewise if I sign up for agent ot agent get called ahead off me no matter what.
We do not have a classification for D1

That's an example of why these types of negotiations can take so long. Just in the OT article, there are so many differences that need to be considered. There are many differences and many details that need attention, then on top of that, you have the Company that looks for what they prefer.

In MIA, for instance, we have a set of rules we follow for overtime that expands on our contractual language. All that will go away and I'm sure it will not be popular if we get any of the current IAM language, especially the PTer getting called before a FTer.
 
They can cut as high as they sell to congress to cut. 3 times that I have watched in past has been 50%, 50% and the latest as high as 60% which ends up giving affected retirees as much as 2/3rds cut in benefit payouts.


I never said AMFA was after fleet. AMFA won't take fleet as they are not on the list of "related". 1 Not upset chief, just disappointed. 2 The AMFA drive at AA mx was derailed by collusion between the TWU. ibt, AA as well as a little by NMB, and that my friend is why it failed. The AMFA trying to work it's way back in at the time of the "association" vote that was "suppose" to happen as promised by both unions and this asso., is the one I am refering to as far as AMFA getting back in and yes AMFA would have prevailed after all the idiotic BS they unions, co., asso., as well as the NMB just ran over them with, and this is where these unions were scared to death of being removed from the property.
3 Get a clue dude, I am worried about anyone under the industrial unions still working under BK contracts. 4 No disrespect sir but AMFA does not give 2 shites about your fleet group. 5 It just goes to show how you have no clue how AMFA runs. 6 I will not stop unless the mechanics ask me to leave, reason being, your little buddy here would not leave the mechanics thread when he was asked to leave, so pls explain to little jonny how that feels. I am here for life, you don't like exercise your options it's a free country...
You write some funny stuff. Lets go through your post item by item shall we.
1. Are you just as dissapointed as when you were unsuccessful at stapling the AirTran mechanics to the bottom of your list?
2. Conspiracy theory much? The AMFA drive was derailed because AMFA relied on a grass-roots card drive rather that invest the time and $$$ to make it successful. And when the card drive was unseccessful, then AMFA was "hoping" for a vote. Since a vote never happened, bye bye the AMFA.
3. You need to get a clue, The IAM represented groups are not under a BK CBA anymore. Sure there are remnents in the agreement, but it is by no means an entirly BK agreement.
4. I'm glad to hear that the AMFA doesn't care about FLeet, I'm sure your TWU and IAM brothers and sisters would love to hear this, and when the AMFA asks for their support if a strike was ever to occur, do you think they should support the AMFA since you don't give 2 SHITES about fleet or customer service because they are not on the list of related? With comments like this, I would hope they tell the AMFA to go pound sand.
5. Of course I have no clue how AMFA runs, I'm not a member nor would I want to be.
6. Please do not stop, you are very entertaining. I never asked you to leave, or post in a different thread, this thread pertains to JCBA negotiations, whether a MTC or Fleet agent posts here, it is all shared and could potentially affect both workgroups. What bothers me is you posting on here like you have inside information, yet you don't even work for either LAA or LUS.
 
I'm guessing that the window between late September - prior to Thanksgiving will be critical. That's the window. If something doesn't happen then, then you can prolly count on these negotiations pushing section 6, in 9 months after that window. The IAM has to make its move prior to the 3rd pension cuts. And the cuts will happen whether the TWU members come in or not. The cuts have to be massive this time, just like last time. The reports heavily favor a complete elimination of all unreduced plans. I mean we can talk about benefit amounts and play the math game all day, but the bottom line is that us airline peeps in this plan will have to suck it up and be forced to work until at least 65. Forget about medical bridges since you won't be able to collect retirement until 65. Next to the biggest problem is the misguided assumptions in the IAMNPF since the Trustees have continue to use outdated assumptions which create massive losses in the plan. They are still using 7.5% interest when it should be lower, and they need to better estimate life expectancy as participants are living much longer than their very low assumptions. Because of these 2 items, the liabilities took an additional loss of $50 million. Another factor is that their estimate of the # of participants who quit or walk away prior to becoming eligible for retirement benefits is less than they predict. When LUS came into the plan, we were lucky insomuch that we came in immediately prior to the 2003 cut (actually 1 month prior). This kept us on the A schedule until the next cut. We also got service credit imputed.

I'm not sure what the plan will do for any new TWU prey. I'm guessing that they would imput service credit on them as well since it may not matter if they make new funding policies that eliminate the unreduced plans.

Whatever the case, defined pensions are gone. Stick a fork in them. The laws, etc., are killing these dinosaurs. Basically everyone wants your money and now everyone can take it from you unless you are 80 years old. That's the law. Everything else is too much of a pyramid to survive. The average age is old and unless we can convince a culture shift with millennials that they need to go back to the past and hand money to Pension bosses, we are in big league trouble. Simply unsustainable.

That said, I think PJ wants a new contract and deserves one. But neither him and me have to ditch our medical and small stations without grandfather rights. And no way in hell should we lose catering. It survived 2 bankruptcies and there is no reason why it should be blown up now. And God only knows I don't want any comparison to the United contract. That contract is a complete disaster. It's a company hand book. It has all the cosmetic things like wage, decent retirement, but lacks language, grievance procedure that has teeth, has unlimited part time, boatloads of Temp agents that hang around for 360 days, and no union rules at all.
Ahhh! that wonderful UA contract. If I'm not mistaking the UA contract was negotiated and agreed to by the same guy who now sits , behind closed doors, with the company negotiating our future JCBA. Doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
 
The latest on picketing July 26, DFW.

Brothers and Sisters,

I wanted to take a minute to address a few things in regards to the upcoming informational picket scheduled on Wednesday, July 26th, 2017.

The first thing I want everyone to understand, is that this picket isn't just being planned by Local 513. It's an equal and collaborative effort with all of the TWU Locals on the property here in DFW. Those Locals are 513, 567, and 591. Our Local, 513, has about 3900 members. Local 567 has over 500 mechanics here in DFW, with the bulk of them at the DWH hangar. Local 591 represents over 3800 line mechanics and Stores Clerks system-wide, and over 1100 of those are here in DFW.

The Presidents of these three Locals are all members of the Negotiating Committees for Fleet Service and Maintenance. The Negotiating Committee members have been sitting at the negotiating table for nearly two years, fighting to secure the very best contract they can for us. We've asked a lot of our negotiating team, and not once since they've sat down with the company have they asked us for anything. Now they've asked for the memberships' help, and what they're asking us to do doesn't require much effort on our part at all. They're simply asking us to show up on the picket line on July 26th as a show of solidarity. That's not much, considering all we've asked of them.

Further, we have contacted all the other Unions on the property, and received a swift response from the Pilots, Flight Attendants, and Passenger Service Agents that they will mobilize their memberships, and fully support us on the picket line.

We also have full support of all the Local Presidents around the system, as well as the support of ourInternational Leadership.

Finally, I understand everyone wants to know each and every detail in regards to the picket. Rest assured, you will be fully informed oneverything you need to know in advance. Every detail of this picket is strategically planned and well thought out, including when to release exact details.

Make no mistake, on July 26th a message will be sent. A large turnout shows that we're tired of workingunder a contract that was forced upon us in bankruptcy, and a small turnout shows that we're good with whatever we get, whenever we get it.
 
Ahhh! that wonderful UA contract. If I'm not mistaking the UA contract was negotiated and agreed to by the same guy who now sits , behind closed doors, with the company negotiating our future JCBA. Doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.


So you're saying that UAL Ramp was better off remaining with the CBA that they were legally bound by and not the worked out better deal they were able to secure with Mr Munoz?

Sorry but not how I viewed it.
 
Ahhh! that wonderful UA contract. If I'm not mistaking the UA contract was negotiated and agreed to by the same guy who now sits , behind closed doors, with the company negotiating our future JCBA. Doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
[

me either
 
I think the point being made there Weaaz, was UA peeps accepted a lot of really bad things in that contract.
Coming to an airline near you soon...
 
And here we go folks, directly from the IAM Pension web site,
Please take the few minutes needed to read this page.

http://mypension.iamnpf.org/media/67457/YFYCAug12.pdf

This exact same pitch is on it's way to all of the LAA peeps really soon...


“With a
multi-employer
defined benefit
plan, there is
no overhead for
the company.
It
costs them less
money to provide a better benefit. They don’t have the headaches of administering a plan and the members continue to participate in a secure defined benefit pension plan.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top