JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kev3188 said:
Spending one's life chasing approval is a waste of time.
Haters gonna hate...
One more. Just a personal opinion.

If you support a liar especially knowing he's telling lies then YOU condone those lies and aren't much different then the person telling them. What does that say about the personal value of your own integrity?

Credibility
Honor
Integrity

They should mean something shouldn't they?
 
W, do you know (other than case number) how the equity case will be listed. Something like TWU VS ???...
 
AANOTOK said:
W, do you know (other than case number) how the equity case will be listed. Something like TWU VS ???...

A my buddy JE out of ORD keeps an eye on that every once in awhile. We all know those guys filed their appeal but the court has been past ridiculous now on getting to it. The frustrating thing is there's nothing any of us can do about it. I can't even speculate when they'll hear it.

But wasn't it Demetris vs TWU if I remember correctly?

Edit: Wasn't this the last update?

http://local591.com/docs/2015%5FAugust%5F4%20Equity%20Distribution%20Litigation%20Update%2Epdf
 
WeAAsles said:
A my buddy JE out of ORD keeps an eye on that every once in awhile. We all know those guys filed their appeal but the court has been past ridiculous now on getting to it. The frustrating thing is there's nothing any of us can do about it. I can't even speculate when they'll hear it.

But wasn't it Demetris vs TWU if I remember correctly?

Edit: Wasn't this the last update?

http://local591.com/docs/2015%5FAugust%5F4%20Equity%20Distribution%20Litigation%20Update%2Epdf
I go to the website periodically and go through the pages...lots and lots of cases (appeals)
Not sure if there is any particular order they see them in, doesn't seem to be.
 
Kev3188 said:
I answered; you just didn't like what I had to say.
So you think being credible means that you're chasing approval? No I think it means you have a good inner moral compass.
 
If they're showing solidarity for each other in those negotiations then "I believe" they will show each other solidarity till the end. And who's to say for an absolute certainty that the mechanics aren't done before Fleet?

If one group walks out of those talks before the other it leaves that group staying weaker and gives them less strength at the table since the company is the one closer to the goal line.

And I doubt any of them will publicly announce their intentions on it since everything is fluid.
Sorry, but it shouldn't be up to them, it should be up to the members. Who is paying who to do the job? We are paying them. The CWA got a good contract and they didn't have to wait around for the stews, right? 75% of the CWA was non union with NO SCOPE. They walk out with scope for all stations with 5 flights. The red coats were everywhere, now they are regulated and are paying dues as well. We need to be separate. The stews/Passenger service was separate although the same union, so should we be. I don't want this Association to continue robbing us of close to $1,000 a month. If they can't understand that now, then wait till after this fall if they keep infighting and diaking around. The company put them in time out mode last week in hopes that the two separate groups would get a grip on themselves and work together and I hope they learned from their errors. I can only hope that Parker keeps his patience with those monkeys, for our sake.
 
Tim Nelson said:
Sorry, but it shouldn't be up to them, it should be up to the members. Who is paying who to do the job? We are paying them. The CWA got a good contract and they didn't have to wait around for the stews, right? 75% of the CWA was non union with NO SCOPE. They walk out with scope for all stations with 5 flights. The red coats were everywhere, now they are regulated and are paying dues as well. We need to be separate. The stews/Passenger service was separate although the same union, so should we be. I don't want this Association to continue robbing us of close to $1,000 a month. If they can't understand that now, then wait till after this fall if they keep infighting and diaking around. The company put them in time out mode last week in hopes that the two separate groups would get a grip on themselves and work together and I hope they learned from their errors. I can only hope that Parker keeps his patience with those monkeys, for our sake.
Again calling the elected representatives of our Unions, monkeys? Well I guess if you can call them monkeys, I can call you GARBAGE.

If name calling is your personal flavor, yea garbage fits you well.
 
WeAAsles said:
So you think being credible means that you're chasing approval? No I think it means you have a good inner moral compass.
So do I. Being credible and worrying about how others may or may not perceive you are two different things.
 
Kev3188 said:
So do I. Being credible and worrying about how others may or may not perceive you are two different things.
Who said anything about perceptions Kev? The only word I'm concerned with is credibility. Either you're credible or your not?

Fox News/ Not credible
Fact check org/ Credible

Tim Nelson (By his own admission) Not credible.
 
WeAAsles said:
A my buddy JE out of ORD keeps an eye on that every once in awhile. We all know those guys filed their appeal but the court has been past ridiculous now on getting to it. The frustrating thing is there's nothing any of us can do about it. I can't even speculate when they'll hear it.
But wasn't it Demetris vs TWU if I remember correctly?
Edit: Wasn't this the last update?http://local591.com/docs/2015_August_4%20Equity%20Distribution%20Litigation%20Update.pdf
Juan does do a good job at providing that info but it would be nice if he didnt butter up to the twu intl all the time. It killed him politically in ord.
 
Kev3188 said:
So do I. Being credible and worrying about how others may or may not perceive you are two different things.
Weasel cant get his head around that. Lol. He is presenting a case when nobody is in the courtroom. I never realized i would get accused by saying i could care less about credibility, ie, credit or how someone perceives me. Due to his hate and fascination with me, i guess he has just lost it. I guess i shouldnt be surprised since he concluded that i cant retire due to my apparent modest living arrangements.
 
Tim Nelson said:
Weasel cant get his head around that. Lol. He is presenting a case when nobody is in the courtroom. I never realized i would get accused by saying i could care less about credibility, ie, credit or how someone perceives me. Due to his hate and fascination with me, i guess he has just lost it. I guess i shouldnt be surprised since he concluded that i cant retire due to my apparent modest living arrangements.

No hate or fascination in the slightest. I was never educated in giving psychiatric evaluations.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/credibility

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/credit?s=t
 
No hate or fascination in the slightest. I was never educated in giving psychiatric evaluations.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/credibility

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/credit?s=t
I couldn't agree more with that definition. Your misapplication of it earlier was in error. In the context of myself, I am a slob that drinks Miller 64 and likes scratching my balls. Now go run and paste that on one of your dopey facebook groups and strip me of any remaining credibility! lol. And don't forget to tell people that I have to work until I'm 70 because I am flat out poor and live in a small efficiency room. ah ha ha ah ha ha ha. And then realize when the IAM Pension video comes out, that it takes someone with NO credibility at all to "Pants" that complete disaster and turn it upside down where it belongs.

As an aside, I automatically updated to Windows 10 and it screwed up my files and webcam. I'm sure a google search will direct me on what to do. So, unfortunately a small delay in the pension video. Alas, even less credibility. What is a gent suppose to do?
 
Tim Nelson said:
I couldn't agree more with that definition. Your misapplication of it earlier was in error. In the context of myself, I am a slob that drinks Miller 64 and likes scratching my balls. Now go run and paste that on one of your dopey facebook groups and strip me of any remaining credibility! lol. And don't forget to tell people that I have to work until I'm 70 because I am flat out poor and live in a small efficiency room. ah ha ha ah ha ha ha. And then realize when the IAM Pension video comes out, that it takes someone with NO credibility at all to "Pants" that complete disaster and turn it upside down where it belongs.As an aside, I automatically updated to Windows 10 and it screwed up my files and webcam. I'm sure a google search will direct me on what to do. So, unfortunately a small delay in the pension video. Alas, even less credibility. What is a gent suppose to do?

You are simply a liar who has a personal vendetta and an ax to grind mostly with the leadership of IAM District 141 because you can't get your way. You make it personal because you're not in the position you feel you should be.

You've said this before to me and I'll say it back to you. I won't let YOU mess up my negotiations and by extension the contract that will effect ME. Basically you're messing with my wallet.

Robert DeNero/ Parenthood

"I'll take you down, I'll take you down to Chinatown Foker"

http://youtu.be/4oz4G3rO5zg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top