JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.
AANOTOK said:
That's only because you mistook the Easter Bunny for a gerbil...Sorry W, that was too easy!
Actually my Mom took away my Teddy Bear because she suspected me of humping it.

Moms can always tell when their boys are lying to them.
 
Tim Nelson said:
The IAM wants more members and is willing to join management's team and subsidize the rest of us if everyone is cool with it. But the company isn't going to give us 1 flight a day scope and has already indicated it will wiggle if the price is right. Weasel may have been tipped off about this because he actually mentioned it months earlier about how the metrics and $30 doesn't fit well in low yield low revenue mid markets. The TWU is insistent of $30 and worry about the unborn later. Not that the IAM hasn't tossed away the unborn, because it has when it decided to freeze our scope and not bring in additional stations like IAH. IMO, we must take care of the current dues payers FIRST and FOREMOST. FIRST AND FOREMOST. In these talks, I don't want to sacrifice the current members for the unborn, for the most part. For example, for the sake of right, I'm not saying that the starting wage should still be at ridiculous low levels. In that case, I believe the unborn [insert new hire] should make at least $15. But we have to keep and enhance language that funnels people to the top of the scale with full time opportunities. I like the TWU's "Full time" First overtime. The TWU pt caps seem better. The TWU retirement and health care is equal whether part time or full time. So, although we must take care of the current peeps first, we can't keep allowing the "IAM way" by subsidizing full timers by slashing part time benefits. That incites less full time opportunities and less money for full timers.
Quite noble but I'm not willing to fight  for TWU P/T health benefits it is already a great P/T job. As long as there is a cap in place most will be fine. I do understand someone totally disagreeing with my view
 
WeAAsles said:
Actually my Mom took away my Teddy Bear because she suspected me of humping it.

Moms can always tell when their boys are lying to them.
That's because you went through 6 Teddy bears a week
 
I have to wonder sometimes? You mention Parker an awful lot and seem to believe everything he says and are trying to convince us the same thing?

I bet your an inside mole for the company.

You claim you don't have to work and have boatloads of money? Take 20 trips a year? All the things you've done in the last 20 years. Yea your on someone's payroll I bet.
It's a shame when the biggest IAM Pollyanna who filled in for 700 and is now 701, has to reduce his comments down to Conspiracy instead of focusing on the issues. Parker is shrewd and I'm not apologizing or advocating for him, certainly I'm not paying dues to him. But I also don't think toleration is always a virtue, and in the case of your continual babble blaming parker for everything, I asked you to point out when and where did the IAM actually present a proposal regarding our wages and pension, other than an opener 8 months ago????

You yourself, along with Prez flat out admitted that there are ONLY 7 open articles and that pension, wages, etc isn't even on the table yet. So, when someone as yourself speaks out of your arse, I call the BS on it. If you want to make this personal and tag me with Parker then I'm very sorry for you brother.
 
Worldport said:
That's because you went through 6 Teddy bears a week
Just one. She took it away when I was 16. After that I began humping Rosa Goglia. I liked Rosa better than my Teddy Bear actually.
 
Tim Nelson said:
It's a shame when the biggest IAM Pollyanna who filled in for 700 and is now 701, has to reduce his comments down to Conspiracy instead of focusing on the issues. Parker is shrewd and I'm not apologizing or advocating for him, certainly I'm not paying dues to him. But I also don't think toleration is always a virtue, and in the case of your continual babble blaming parker for everything, I asked you to point out when and where did the IAM actually present a proposal regarding our wages and pension, other than an opener 8 months ago????

You yourself, along with Prez flat out admitted that there are ONLY 7 open articles and that pension, wages, etc isn't even on the table yet. So, when someone as yourself speaks out of your arse, I call the BS on it. If you want to make this personal and tag me with Parker then I'm very sorry for you brother.
I think we all agree that both sides are at fault. We are all here long enough to know that if the company really wanted to get this done they could. I'm still trying to figure out how the union pissed them off
 
Tim Nelson said:
It's a shame when the biggest IAM Pollyanna who filled in for 700 and is now 701, has to reduce his comments down to Conspiracy instead of focusing on the issues. Parker is shrewd and I'm not apologizing or advocating for him, certainly I'm not paying dues to him. But I also don't think toleration is always a virtue, and in the case of your continual babble blaming parker for everything, I asked you to point out when and where did the IAM actually present a proposal regarding our wages and pension, other than an opener 8 months ago????You yourself, along with Prez flat out admitted that there are ONLY 7 open articles and that pension, wages, etc isn't even on the table yet. So, when someone as yourself speaks out of your arse, I call the BS on it. If you want to make this personal and tag me with Parker then I'm very sorry for you brother.
You really have either zero clue how negotiations work or you are purposely trying to create confusion on the thread. I'm guessing with you it's a little bit of both.

Since you spend so much time on here these days I guess they ran you off all the FB pages again and the ones you run where you knock off people who disagree with you are dead.

Again I absolutely 100% believe that you're on the company dime. Either that or Ford and Harrison shells out a few bucks to you.
 
Worldport said:
I think we all agree that both sides are at fault. We are all here long enough to know that if the company really wanted to get this done they could. I'm still trying to figure out how the union pissed them off

By not rolling over to accept everything they want to offer. Like Peterson just put out and said.
 
WeAAsles said:
You really have either zero clue how negotiations work or you are purposely trying to create confusion on the thread. I'm guessing with you it's a little bit of both.

Since you spend so much time on here these days I guess they ran you off all the FB pages again and the ones you run where you knock off people who disagree with you are dead.

Again I absolutely 100% believe that you're on the company dime. Either that or Ford and Harrison shells out a few bucks to you.
If he has Josh and wikileaks I see no reason why you shouldn't do the 701 thing 
 
Worldport said:
how about 00701
Obviously 700 handed over the baton. Weasel can call himself 007. Its got a Bond ring to it.
 
At any rate offtopic but why isnt there any full flying usa flags at the DNC? I know several iam bosses are prolly delegates partying on our dime there and rubbing out bernie.
 
Bernie looks like a complete moron now, ditching his beliefs to support hillary. Bernies supporters will most likely vote for uncle donny or stay home.
 
Tim Nelson said:
The IAM wants more members and is willing to join management's team and subsidize the rest of us if everyone is cool with it. But the company isn't going to give us 1 flight a day scope and has already indicated it will wiggle if the price is right. Weasel may have been tipped off about this because he actually mentioned it months earlier about how the metrics and $30 doesn't fit well in low yield low revenue mid markets. The TWU is insistent of $30 and worry about the unborn later. Not that the IAM hasn't tossed away the unborn, because it has when it decided to freeze our scope and not bring in additional stations like IAH. IMO, we must take care of the current dues payers FIRST and FOREMOST. FIRST AND FOREMOST. In these talks, I don't want to sacrifice the current members for the unborn, for the most part. For example, for the sake of right, I'm not saying that the starting wage should still be at ridiculous low levels. In that case, I believe the unborn [insert new hire] should make at least $15. But we have to keep and enhance language that funnels people to the top of the scale with full time opportunities. I like the TWU's "Full time" First overtime. The TWU pt caps seem better. The TWU retirement and health care is equal whether part time or full time. So, although we must take care of the current peeps first, we can't keep allowing the "IAM way" by subsidizing full timers by slashing part time benefits. That incites less full time opportunities and less money for full timers.
I think they didn't open IAH because some stations were under the minimum so they left them open instead. A fair deal if you ask me
 
Tim Nelson said:
Obviously 700 handed over the baton. Weasel can call himself 007. Its got a Bond ring to it.
 
At any rate offtopic but why isnt there any full flying usa flags at the DNC? I know several iam bosses are prolly delegates partying on our dime there and rubbing out bernie.
 
Bernie looks like a complete moron now, ditching his beliefs to support hillary. Bernies supporters will most likely vote for uncle donny or stay home.
What we need is some union delegates to be at the next town hall meeting. They better be there it is  always at a big city with plenty of union members. My dues at work
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top