Very few remaining synergies that the company hasn't already tapped into regarding cross utilization for fleet. I think there are only 12 stations or so, including ORD. It's like one workforce up here. Doing a work bid for 60 employees is prolly negligible or just a small cost. That said, I support the cross utilization agreement.
Nonetheless, there are some things that the company wanted and secured with a AIP. It wanted to mirror Delta and, now United in regards to eliminating caps/ratios, and it wanted LUS health care, small stations, and catering. It got LUS health care and loosened up the part time caps and scheduling. It didn't get lav or catering or small stations (not completely as they grandfathered). The wage was $32 but that was before Delta announced the return of full profit sharing once again.
For LUS, imo, this is a bad joke. We ultimately lose small stations, lose part time caps, lose LUS health care. Gain some extra days off, shift differ, a wage bump, overtime bypass, and extra 3 minutes of rest time. At best, it is cost neutral for LUS fleet, may actually be cost negative. If it comes to a vote, it will pass since the TWU controls the numbers and will be in strong cost positive territory.